Whiskey_Clear
Banned
- Messages
- 10,486
Just want to say that the Russell stuff we had was very high quality. I still have some of my stuff (and wear it) from 15 years ago. It was definitely as high a quality (and maybe better sometimes) as the other big 3 (certainly not anywhere near "walmart" level). I bought a pair of Russell athletic shorts from a local sporting goods store last month and they are the best pair of shorts I've ever had. Just trying to be fair here.
Also, Russell is a good company founded by a GT grad, I believe. the reason we went with Russell for so long was simply because they gave us the best deal (because of the GT connection), not because our leaders were just idiots or something. I suppose the leadership decided that due to perception (not logic or anything measurable) the trade-off for how it affected recruiting and branding was worth going with a different company from this point forward. I don't know if that was a right or wrong decision. I'm fine with it and am good with Adidas, but there's no reason to crap on Russell unfairly.
BTW, I'm not trying to direct this at you UgaBlows. I'm addressing a common perception among our fanbase and the public in general.
Fake News!!
Russell was crap quality! How would you know otherwise? Just because you bought a fake jersey off eBay!
Perceptions are what they are. I think the big missing component recently with Russell had more to do with lack of swag rather than lack of quality. But if you removed the labels and patches I bet most wouldn’t be able to tell a difference in quality between brands.
Russell brand perceptions were bad with recruits though and we have enough hurdles to jump in that department without adding any more.
Seems like the new contract focuses much more on swag than dollars for the school. Probably a net plus.