The goody two shoes would whine & pout, but we should absolutely re-hire DLaB as soon as his show cause is over. If we don't, someone else will.
Does he need $?Would he come back?
The goody two shoes would whine & pout, but we should absolutely re-hire DLaB as soon as his show cause is over.
The goody two shoes would whine & pout, but we should absolutely re-hire DLaB as soon as his show cause is over. If we don't, someone else will.
Hear, hear!If he wants to come back here you sign him that day!
I liked LaBarrie, but I don't know how you rehire a guy who lied to his bosses and contributed to sanctions for the school.I really like LaBarrie and would welcome him back. I don't know how much damage his lies did to his relationship to the GTAA.
Unfortunately have to agreeI liked LaBarrie, but I don't know how you rehire a guy who lied to his bosses and contributed to sanctions for the school.
I liked LaBarrie, but I don't know how you rehire a guy who lied to his bosses and contributed to sanctions for the school.
I have two reasons.
I believe in second chances, especially for a man who I believe learned his lesson and regrets his mistake.
Also, if we don't, someone else, probably a direct competitor for talent, will and now you have one more highly connected ATL recruiter going up against us, rather than for us.
This isn't corporate America or the medical field or government. This is college basketball. Get passed it and add resources that can help you win.
I have two reasons.
I believe in second chances, especially for a man who I believe learned his lesson and regrets his mistake.
Also, if we don't, someone else, probably a direct competitor for talent, will and now you have one more highly connected ATL recruiter going up against us, rather than for us.
This isn't corporate America or the medical field or government. This is college basketball. Get passed it and add resources that can help you win.
Probably not. We seem to not really care that much about athletics unfortunately.Agree wholeheartedly, but do you think that the powers that be at GT would consider that for more than a half-second? Serious question.
I think we have to be mature about the "lied to his bosses" thing. It could be argued that he lied to them to try to protect them. And, when it all came crashing down, he took the brunt of the fall for the Institute.
A better argument against it would simply be to say you just don't hire a guy who had a for cause put on him. It's possible other places won't hire him in a real role right away either.
I disagree with this stance considering the state of things in college basketball. There are no rules and if you break the nonexistent rules you simply thumb your nose at the NCAA because they're a terrible governing body.
And, let's be honest, the only reason we're on "probation" is because we acted honorably. That shouldn't earn you a stiffer punishment than the unabashed and consistent rule-breakers but that's the state of things. We have to adjust or die.
Agree wholeheartedly, but do you think that the powers that be at GT would consider that for more than a half-second? Serious question.
LaBarrie did something he regrets and has paid a steep price for it. But, if he remains well connected to the ATL and GT can believe he will follow whatever rules the GTAA says he should follow, then I would be overjoyed to see him representing GT basketball again.
Admittedly, I'd be surprised if the powers that be would take him back, although maybe that changes with Bud gone.
That said, I think we tell the NCAA to eff off and rehire a quality candidate.
It was for 3 years so it expires sometime around March 2022When is the show cause over?