- Messages
- 10,066
- Location
- Williamsburg Virginia
We had a tough schedule overall. Our conference schedule (especially when factoring the road series) was key to that. As it turned out (ironically)... the strong SoS factored into the bid... not even a bubble team as far as the committee was concerned. The chatter was focused on the OOC schedule. Perhaps the coaching staff actually knew what they were doing with the schedule.
For record.... I want Ga Tech to play tough competition every single game. But I just want to see good teams play. My desired schedule would have resulted in a bunch of quality opponents... more losses... and plans this weekend to be doing something other than watching my team in a regional because they would not have made it.
I disagree (of course). I think the ACC end was harder than anyone expected which helped our ACC SoS.
If we hadn't scheduled the the patsies, our SoS OOC would have been much better as would our overall. Those patsies ended up where they usually do RPI of 212, 256 and 284 with 4 games against 284. That is gross scheduling incompetence.
Of course we had to win games against good opponents and we didn't win enough against the teams we played. At least I think 10-14 against Quad 1 means you aren't a Quad 1 team which we always should be. If we had won more we'd be fine. If we had scheduled slightly tougher OOC and won those games, we would have maybe snuck into a 2 seed. But we never won enough to make a 1 seed.