Whiskey_Clear
Banned
- Messages
- 10,486
Yes Sir.
Hell no to Key then. HELL NO
Yes Sir.
Elliott may be a good fit because he's young and hungry and can relate to engineering academic issues.
I'd ask any potential hire "how can you get us to compete with Clemson and UGA?" That answer really can't be "I'm a great recruiter so I can get guys like UGA and Bama or UCF did." I bet half of the guys recruited to UGA, Bama and UCF could not get into Tech, so even if they were convinced to want to come, they aren't qualifying and can't come. So, I would want the coach to tell me how we can compete and maybe its the innovative offense (TO or air-raid, or whatever), innovative defense, or something else, but it would have to be something and a track record to show success doing it. CPJ had all of that. So, a young, good recruiting Paul Johnson is what we need (without the *****ly personality). Maybe that is Satterfield or Jeff monken, or some innovative coach from Citadel or some small school that I don't know about. But the new coach has to have an answer to the question and it can't be "I got 5 star kids to come to where I worked at last stop." To me that requirement buts the brakes on the Brent Keys, Mel Tuckers, etc.
Elliot is my top guy.
He fits the culture and his system would be easily transferable. He knows the area and is familiar with GT’s recruiting and recruiting restrictions. He also is aware of the advantages.
I think Satterfield and Elliot are about the same. Here’s the pros and cons I see.Really feel Satterfield would be our best option. Hope TStan can get out in front of this. He should be interviewing Satterfield this weekend and not Wisenhunt. Afraid Louisville will hire him quickly. Hope he does not screw this hire up.
I have a neighbor who has a cousin who is married to a guy that knows someone close to an insider I will see what he knows .I saw someone post on a board (can’t rememebr which one) aand I believe it was someone close to the program or someone who knew someone close to the program, said we are in a really good position right now to hire a new coach. Not sure why that exactly means though lol.
Dabo was never even a coordinator
Semantics, but DRad didn't promote Dabo, Phillips did. DRad was at Tech at the time.That was a an internal hire. Just because WE didn’t see it as a good hire doesn’t mean DRad didn’t.
And Brent Key bad mouthed GT as an institute in negative recruiting. Not the scheme (we’ll maybe / probably that too) but the INSTITUTE. And now some won’t to hire this guy when his own words will be used against him?
Hell No
Scott Satterfield may go to Loserville so i guess his family would have no problem moving awayRegarding Satterfield, I just don’t know if he (and his wife and family) are willing to move to Atlanta away from the mountain lifestyle they currently enjoy in Boone, North Carolina. Would the challenge of taking over the GT job along with the extra $$ pay be enough for him to make this monumental move?
Regarding Elliott, does he believe he can overcome GT’s recruiting limitations? Certainly all of the highly skilled 4- and 5-star players he coaches at Clemson makes him look like an excellent candidate, but it very likely won’t be the same for him at GT. I’m sure he realizes this, so the question for him is likely to be, do I have the cajones to take on the GT challenge?
In reading the threads with all the names, the one that is confusing to me is that nobody seems to like Chad Lunsford from Georgia Southern.
- He's 41, so he is a young up-and-comer...
- He is from Georgia...
- He has recruited the SE his entire career (for Auburn and Georgia Southern)
- His primary skill is recruiting..
- He went 9-3 in his first season, and has a 10 win season on the table if they win their bowl game
- They had 12 players make All Sun Belt this year
- His offense directly translates to Georgia Tech talent, but with all the modern touches the fans want (runs out of shotgun, multiple sets, more QB friendly, feature running back, run the QB about half as much)...
I like this. From my neck of the woods as well
Well first there would have to be visible evidence that Key did that for it to be used against him effectively. If it’s out there then that’s not a good thing. Otherwise I doubt many schools even know about it.That was a an internal hire. Just because WE didn’t see it as a good hire doesn’t mean DRad didn’t.
And Brent Key bad mouthed GT as an institute in negative recruiting. Not the scheme (well maybe / probably that too) but the INSTITUTE. And now some want to hire this guy when his own words will be used against him?
Hell No
Scott Satterfield may go to Loserville so i guess his family would have no problem moving away
Derek Mason could be going to Colorado where he's a major candidate for the head coaching jobKind of surprised Derek Mason hasn’t been mentioned more. Not sure I would actually want him, but he’s done well at Vandy which is one of the hardest P5 schools to coach at.
Do you know Mike Leach??? I would love to have him, but I don't think there is a snowballs chance in hell he would ever come to Atlanta. According to Swing Your Sword his favorite place he has ever lived was Valdosta, GA, and not because it was a bustling city. Leach likes a slow, quiet life and I could never see him coming to us.I don't agree at all. I'd prefer Leach above all, and I think he's a realistic choice.
Regarding Satterfield, I just don’t know if he (and his wife and family) are willing to move to Atlanta away from the mountain lifestyle they currently enjoy in Boone, North Carolina. Would the challenge of taking over the GT job along with the extra $$ pay be enough for him to make this monumental move?
Regarding Elliott, does he believe he can overcome GT’s recruiting limitations? Certainly all of the highly skilled 4- and 5-star players he coaches at Clemson makes him look like an excellent candidate, but it very likely won’t be the same for him at GT. I’m sure he realizes this, so the question for him is likely to be, do I have the cajones to take on the GT challenge?
I think Satterfield and Elliot are about the same. Here’s the pros and cons I see.
Satterfield
pros: done really well against better completion, is a head coach, and would probably retain CNW.
Cons: hasn’t coached at the D1 level (not to worried about) the biggest worry for me would be recruiting, from what I understand the D staff had to be told not to go after “projects” like they might have at App State because that’s what they were able to get. Worry he might would be looking at lower players because of what he’s had to work with at App State.
Elliot:
pros: egeenering degree with the highest gpa on his football team. Learned under a very good program. Young offensive mind who could bring energy and is a good recruiter from what I’ve read.
Cons: hasn’t been a head coach.
Imo the ceiling is a tad higher for Elliot as of now because he has at least coached at this level and knows how to recruit at this level. I wouldnt be upset with either one being hired though.
The other good thing is, with both of them the offensive transition wouldnt be major imo.
Mike Leach as head coach with Brent Venables as defensive coordinator would be an interesting coaching staffIMO, Mike Leach = Pretty Good Coach, but also, Mike Leach = Bat-Sh** Crazy
No Thanks !!