JacketFromUGA
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,897
except for you know the one on our roster.No taller QB who is a passer will want to play in this offense.
except for you know the one on our roster.No taller QB who is a passer will want to play in this offense.
Taller than what?No taller QB who is a passer will want to play in this offense.
I'm not sure you are right to the absolute, but won't argue much and will go you one better: no taller QB can run this offense. That's radical but it requires so much in the mesh and down the line where agility is essential. Guys up in the 6-2+ range have a long way to bend over. But no, generally if you are a QB, short or tall, who loves to toss it about I can name four schools, maybe five, to stay away from. But if you like to run the ball, then there are dozens to avoid.No taller QB who is a passer will want to play in this offense.
Tevin ran the O to perfection at 6'0". That's not "tall", but it's not "short", either. It's tall enough to stand in the pocket and see downfield over the LOS.I'm not sure you are right to the absolute, but won't argue much and will go you one better: no taller QB can run this offense. That's radical but it requires so much in the mesh and down the line where agility is essential. Guys up in the 6-2+ range have a long way to bend over. But no, generally if you are a QB, short or tall, who loves to toss it about I can name four schools, maybe five, to stay away from. But if you like to run the ball, then there are dozens to avoid.
Washington was first rate with that part of the game, and that is the important part. But Saturday I had a blast from the past when Johnson went for it on 4th and 1 with a QB and Marshall did the Washington porpoise into the line. I don't disagree with going for it as the only logical option, I just wish he would not run the sneak anymore. I'd almost rather throw it if those were the choices.Tevin ran the O to perfection at 6'0". That's not "tall", but it's not "short", either. It's tall enough to stand in the pocket and see downfield over the LOS.
TM scored a TD on a sneak at the goal line.Washington was first rate with that part of the game, and that is the important part. But Saturday I had a blast from the past when Johnson went for it on 4th and 1 with a QB and Marshall did the Washington porpoise into the line. I don't disagree with going for it as the only logical option, I just wish he would not run the sneak anymore. I'd almost rather throw it if those were the choices.
I don't have the facts but remember that the backup generally came in for trash time, and then was to run the ball to eat clock. I can't remember at time when the game wasn't decided that the backup didn't come in other than for injury.
As to the QBs not being thrilled. Sometimes there isn't much a of a "game" to throw off. Some days some QBs match-up better than others. Other days it doesn't matter when the DL lives in our backfield. It's a team game.
except for you know the one on our roster.
if we consistently complete and gain yards from it and the defenses are allowing us to? Yes absolutely.OK, I stand corrected (I didn't know LC's height). Do you think CPJ is gonna change the offense much to let this kid display his obvious passing talents though? I'm talking "attempt more than 8 passes/game"?
Chippy....Officiating seems so poor in this game.
He can give you the long and the short answer. Both the same.OK, I stand corrected (I didn't know LC's height). Do you think CPJ is gonna change the offense much to let this kid display his obvious passing talents though? I'm talking "attempt more than 8 passes/game"?
In 2011 did defenses loaded the box and ran down the pitch like they do now. ? t q would do better at passing and running than Tech In, but not at running the TO.Tevin ran the O to perfection at 6'0". That's not "tall", but it's not "short", either. It's tall enough to stand in the pocket and see downfield over the LOS.
Guess this goes here as well as anywhere