I'm more excited about the future of this D than I ever was for Roof's D. I think the youth of our secondary showed this year and one of the reasons the Pass D was pretty rough.
I do have one complaint, I HATE when we only rush 3 on 3rd and long. I'm not talking about 3rd and 15, I'm saying more like 3rd and 7-10. We don't have the horses upfront to rush 3 and pressure the QB regularly and no matter how many guys you drop in coverage, if you give a decent QB enough time, somebody's gonna get open.
My post from TOS:
Numbers don’t lie but they don’t tell the full truth. The defense is schematically better and for the 30th time this not your typical 3-4 defense where you need 280-290lb DEs. It is predicated on quickness and getting up field. Something totally different from CTRs read &react man on a man and Groh occupy a man and build a wall on the LOS. The biggest issue this season & the reason for the skewed numbers is finishing. Whether that’s getting the QB on the ground before he gets a 1st down or horrible play recognition. Contrary to popular belief we got a good amount pressure this year, but bad tackling always seemed to follow it.
The defense should be stout next season and i expect to see some packages such as 2-4-5 with Thomas and Dominick as pass rushers. Key is to replace ASA’s disruption whether we go with the tweener like Dingle or put a big body like Chimezda/Glanton there. Someone must step up
But the talent is oozing on the side of the ball
If i had my way it would be:
NT: Adams
DE: Owens
DE: Glanton or Dingle
Jack: Charlie Thomas
MLB: BJS
WLB: Curry (hope someone overtake him)
Stinger: KOliver
CB: Swilling
CB: Walton
SS: Carpenter
FS: Juanyah
This!We have a defense ? Just kidding. Not fair to judge on 1 year need to see Improvement next year and after that we can judge
Wow!I miss Ted, I didn’t want him fired. The Roof and Andy Mac Combo was the best recruiting Duo I’ve seen at GT.
Lol...I miss Ted, I didn’t want him fired. The Roof and Andy Mac Combo was the best recruiting Duo I’ve seen at GT.
If i had my way it would be:
NT: Adams
DE: Owens
DE: Glanton or Dingle
Jack: Charlie Thomas
MLB: BJS
WLB: Curry (hope someone overtake him)
Stinger: KOliver
CB: Swilling
CB: Walton
SS: Carpenter
FS: Juanyah
I miss Ted, I didn’t want him fired. The Roof and Andy Mac Combo was the best recruiting Duo I’ve seen at GT.
I've been very pleased.
I understand that overall the defensive performance is about the same, but there are some key differences:
-All positions in roof's D were bad, and they were bad consistently. Our DLine has been great all year and the LB/DB have showed flashes here and there.
-We've won several games because the D stiffened up when it needed to and made some plays.
-We have *WAY* more turnovers on defense this year.
-The defense always improves it's performance as the game goes on. That's good coaching/adjusting. I'd like to see them start a little better though.
Nothing much has changed. Gained more turnovers, but otherwise no real improvements.
Tackling and pursuit angles, especially by the DBs, was the worst I’ve ever seen in a long time.
I do not expect to see much, if any change, for the better next year.
Not to pick on you in particular, but your post has several itemized opinions which make it easier for me to address.
-All positions in roof's D were bad, and they were bad consistently. Our DLine has been great all year and the LB/DB have showed flashes here and there.
Our DL is vastly improved, but I wouldn't call them great.
-We've won several games because the D stiffened up when it needed to and made some plays.
Can you please point to a game other than UNC we won that way? We won the Miami game because our offense mercifully held onto the ball for almost 7 minutes to close out the game after the D had let Miami go 95 yards for a TD to make it a 1 score game. I guess you could argue the UVA game, but that really came down to failed FG attempt. Last year we beat VT on a last minute Defensive play, so I reall don't see this as a huge area of improvement.
-We have *WAY* more turnovers on defense this year.
This is absolutely true, and while TOs tend to be a product of luck, and therefore an unreliable measure of defensive success, aggressive Ds tend to have more than bend don;t break Ds. I have no problems crediting CNW with this uptick.
-The defense always improves it's performance as the game goes on. That's good coaching/adjusting. I'd like to see them start a little better though.
The same was often said last year, but instead of praising the coaching, it was rather an indictment on why CTR couldn't get it right in the first half and had to wait until halftime to adjust.
My thoughts:
Don't get me wrong, I am somewhat excited about the direction of our defense. I just can't whitewash poor results and pretend they are necessarily indicators of improvement to come. Statistically speaking, with the exception of turnovers, our defense regressed drastically from last year and was on a par with the worst year of the CTR era. I get that there is a learning curve, and that improvement is usually seen somewhere in year two of a defensive change, but to say we see signs of success in this years tea leaves is a bit premature in my opinion.
Now, if we see a resurgent D in the Bowl game, after they get a month to prepare, then you could *maybe* make an argument, but I think the real answer to this thread topic is that it is simply too soon to tell. Let's give CNW 2-3 more years and a chance to get some of his own players in the system before we pass judgement either good or bad.
I've said my piece on Woody's D elsewhere, but I have to warn people about this.Our DL played well against the run considering how light they are, but pass rushing was weak. We need more beef up front in this defense, and a lot more speed and strength at linebacker. Overall, I guess Woody did about the best that could be expected with his personnel, but I just think he ought to blitz more.
My post from TOS:
If i had my way it would be:
NT: Adams
DE: Owens
DE: Glanton or Dingle
Jack: Charlie Thomas
MLB: BJS
WLB: Curry (hope someone overtake him)
Stinger: KOliver
CB: Swilling
CB: Walton
SS: Carpenter
FS: Juanyah
I've said my piece on Woody's D elsewhere, but I have to warn people about this.
If his history as a DC is any indication, Woody likes DLs that are smaller then what we had this year. He likes them "agile, mobile, and hostile" as Jake Gaither used to say. His perfect DL would be three St. Amours. I said in a recruiting thread that a lot of the young men we are recruiting as LBs out of high school might very well end up as DLs. It's speed uber alles for Woody. And, yes, we will blitz more in the future, imho; again, if history is any indication, Woody is Jerry Glanville on that.