Can't deny that, in spite of some (not nearly enough) good seasons since thenDodd did that in 64.
Because a night game on ESPN is more exposure than a 3pm game on ESPNU. These games aren’t guaranteed night games at BDS because uGA isn’t even a guaranteed night game when it’s at BDS.
Just think about it. How many teams would give up 2 guarenteed home games vs NOTRE DAME!!? We did
Great job and cool handleSo excited by this that I just bought 2 more season tickets!
Back in 69 the u of h was in a dinky stadium and had a good team they moved to astro dome . Drew huge crowds - THE PRO TICKETS ARE WAY EXPENSIVE LIKE THEY ARE NOW. Just to get into mbs folks will come if we are not dumpster fire.So then why not just play every game at MBS?
The only one that makes sense is the cash grab.AJC article on the announcement. Gives AD Todd Standbury’s reasons. Read it:
https://www.ajc.com/sports/college/...mercedes-benz-stadium/HSCZUUxUNOAfB1THFYH2vI/
That looks like two teams playing a home and home in their local NFL stadiums instead of on campus. That is a bit different than one team giving up a bunch of already scheduled home games for what I guess is a money grab?
Money money money money moneyAJC article on the announcement. Gives AD Todd Standbury’s reasons. Read it:
https://www.ajc.com/sports/college/...mercedes-benz-stadium/HSCZUUxUNOAfB1THFYH2vI/
If we didn't already have Notre Dame on the schedule and we agreed to two games, one at MBS and one at Soldier field, I would be ecstatic. Moving our two already scheduled home games to a new stadium isn't the same thing. This is basically screaming out that BDS isn't a good enough venue to play Notre Dame in. Do you think Notre Dame or Clemson would be willing to give up 5 already scheduled home games against quality teams to play in an NFL stadium close by?What incentive for them do this? Why is this not a minor league for them. Everyone loves Camp Randall and TD Jesus
Clemson doesn’t have a local NFL team unless they want to play in Panthers stadium in Charlotte which doesn’t make sense.
Why do you think we weren't outnumbered vs. Tennessee? I'm really curious why folks think it'll be worse at MBS. From all I can tell, we will bring more to MBS. No one here is sitting these games out, from what I can tell.Georgia Tech fans are likely to be outnumbered in all 5 of those games in Mercedes Benz Stadium and it will look like a home game for the other team
I don't like the idea of doing this every season. Like i said in an earlier post i think GT should play all their home games in BDS,i happen to be old fashioned in that way.Why do you think we weren't outnumbered vs. Tennessee?
I mean those aren’t really equal comparisons since they are already national brands that are competing for championships. I think a school like TCU or Texas Tech, teams that have good years occasionally but are truly trying up their brand, would jump all over the opportunity. I think it’s possible that some other team will try and copy GT and do something similar possibly in the Cowboy’s stadium. Similar to how CFA starter the kickoff game, then other big stadiums copied their success.If we didn't already have Notre Dame on the schedule and we agreed to two games, one at MBS and one at Soldier field, I would be ecstatic. Moving our two already scheduled home games to a new stadium isn't the same thing. This is basically screaming out that BDS isn't a good enough venue to play Notre Dame in. Do you think Notre Dame or Clemson would be willing to give up 5 already scheduled home games against quality teams to play in an NFL stadium close by?