g0lftime
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 6,051
Then are they employees or on contract. Does that make scholarship and perks taxable? It should.
Then are they employees or on contract. Does that make scholarship and perks taxable? It should.
So much to unpack and so many unknown consequences, but the “good intentions” of revenue sharing are going to be another boon to big football programs. If a kid in a non-revenue sport is considering a couple of schools, the possibility of that school’s football success now becomes a bigger factor.... it’s a potential bonus pool
Unintended consequences!!So much to unpack and so many unknown consequences, but the “good intentions” of revenue sharing are going to be another boon to big football programs. If a kid in a non-revenue sport is considering a couple of schools, the possibility of that school’s football success now becomes a bigger factor.... it’s a potential bonus pool
Question: if these players become salaried employees of the school, is that salary in addition to or in lieu of scholarship?
I’m not thinking this will solve as many issues as it creates... I’m also not sure it’s going to work out for the best interest of the student athletes.
Can’t imagine it could be any worse than the disaster the ungoverned approach has brought us.Government bureaucracy in charge of college sports, hmm , yeah I think that’ll probably work fantastically well.
LOL - "can't imagine" - really?Can’t imagine it could be any worse than the disaster the ungoverned approach has brought us.
Fun thought...Can’t imagine it could be any worse than the disaster the ungoverned approach has brought us.
Can’t imagine it could be any worse than the disaster the ungoverned approach has brought us.
Don’t they play a team sport in the NBA? Not everyone is equally important.Basketball is a team sport. The bench warmers are just as important a contributor as the starters. One of their parts is to
compete hard in practice and weight room so they make the starters better. I think any nil money should be distributed evenly to everyone on the team, otherwise, it is a double standard to call it a team effort.
Yes, really. Hard to do worse than total catastrophic failure.LOL - "can't imagine" - really?
This is communism. In free market capitalism, the most valuable endorsers are the most talented and the most popular.Basketball is a team sport. The bench warmers are just as important a contributor as the starters. One of their parts is to
compete hard in practice and weight room so they make the starters better. I think any nil money should be distributed evenly to everyone on the team, otherwise, it is a double standard to call it a team effort.
Yes, true teamwork is somewhat like communism. It’s everyone sacrificing for the good of all.This is communism. In free market capitalism, the most valuable endorsers are the most talented and the most popular.
I think that’s partly correct.Yes, true teamwork is somewhat like communism. It’s everyone sacrificing for the good of all.
This applies to teams and fans too.One of the things Marx was correct about, and I greatly simply his argument, is that a capitalist system which creates a few winners and a lot of losers undercuts the will to produce in the long run.
So, yes, if I’m not a starter, and the starters are getting million $ gifts to play and I’m struggling to get any recognition or remuneration, I’m probably not going to spend a lot of energy trying to make the team better or help the stars shine even brighter.
Thea challenge for college basketball right now will be how to continue the illusion that the system is fair so all colleges and players will continue to support the system.
This is laughably ignorant. There is no will to produce or improve in an environment where there are no winners or losers. This is why communism always has and always will fail. People will always do what they are incentivized to do. If the are incentivized to do nothing to achieve the same status as everyone else then they will do nothing. If they are incentivized to outperform their peers to receive greater status, then they will strive to excel beyond all others. The opportunity to transform oneself from winner to loser or to elevate one's position in a merit based system, whether that is capitalism in economics or in a non union workforce, was the driving force behind the industrial revolution, which catapulted our country beyond all others. The desire to achieve individual greatness, regardless if someone is starting out below someone else, is the force by which virtually all productivity and achievement is attained.One of the things Marx was correct about, and I greatly simply his argument, is that a capitalist system which creates a few winners and a lot of losers undercuts the will to produce in the long run.
You are half right.This is laughably ignorant. There is no will to produce or improve in an environment where there are no winners or losers. This is why communism always has and always will fail. People will always do what they are incentivized to do. If the are incentivized to do nothing to achieve the same status as everyone else then they will do nothing. If they are incentivized to outperform their peers to receive greater status, then they will strive to excel beyond all others. The opportunity to transform oneself from winner to loser or to elevate one's position in a merit based system, whether that is capitalism in economics or in a non union workforce, was the driving force behind the industrial revolution, which catapulted our country beyond all others. The desire to achieve individual greatness, regardless if someone is starting out below someone else, is the force by which virtually all productivity and achievement is attained.