NCAA Rule Change Proposals

iceeater1969

Helluva Engineer
Messages
9,628
Larger AB will be slower.
That's less of a threat on seam and wheel routes and wide pitch.
I see us adding to substitution packages that include an extra ol guy w / o knee brace as a jumbo a b. He would be super lean and could run midline and can and really occupy a line backer in space. Double this at goal line and short yardage .
In coach i trust!
 
Messages
2,034
My 2 thoughts.
Kick off rule, if a guy catches it in the field he is going to run it. No coach in the world would tell his player not to as it is a broken field play.
Blocking. Well, it is going to change some things for our A backs but havings pent many hours watching Tech Offense lately, when we have really good A backs they effectively roll block. This current crew and a few other in the past, not so. Defenders are getting better at avoiding the block and the result is a missed block with our guy on the ground. It might actually make us better.
 
Messages
13,443
Location
Augusta, GA
My 2 thoughts.
Kick off rule, if a guy catches it in the field he is going to run it. No coach in the world would tell his player not to as it is a broken field play.
Blocking. Well, it is going to change some things for our A backs but havings pent many hours watching Tech Offense lately, when we have really good A backs they effectively roll block. This current crew and a few other in the past, not so. Defenders are getting better at avoiding the block and the result is a missed block with our guy on the ground. It might actually make us better.
It might actually make us better.
That is definitely true, but the operative word there is MIGHT. Let's hope it WILL
 

bobongo

Helluva Engineer
Messages
7,548
My 2 thoughts.
Kick off rule, if a guy catches it in the field he is going to run it. No coach in the world would tell his player not to as it is a broken field play.

Really? If he catches it anywhere inside the 10, he is in great probability going to be stopped short of the 25 yard line, and most likely a lot short of it. I mean, unless he's Gayle Sayers or something.
 
Messages
13,443
Location
Augusta, GA

jgtengineer

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,950

jgtengineer

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,950
We won't be able to cut the MLB with an OL anymore.

That's not entirely true, if the linebacker plays up he can be. if he stays back where he can't be cut we will just have to switch block more ( tackle gets him instead of the outside, a takes outside) Its honestly a better way to block him than to dive. However playing the linebacker off that far will result in more dives and traps getting yardage.
 

dressedcheeseside

Helluva Engineer
Messages
14,212
That's not entirely true, if the linebacker plays up he can be. if he stays back where he can't be cut we will just have to switch block more ( tackle gets him instead of the outside, a takes outside) Its honestly a better way to block him than to dive. However playing the linebacker off that far will result in more dives and traps getting yardage.
If the MLB is playing that far up, we won't need to block him intentionally most of the time anyway, he'll get washed out in the trash. If he's blitzing a gap, that's a different story.
 

AE 87

Helluva Engineer
Messages
13,025
The point is our OL are charging the next level. If they miss one they keep going. And they cut because trying to get position with feet and quickness downfield is lower %.

I also think that on some plays, the mlb is 5+ yds back as we're looking to engage.
 

jgtengineer

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,950
The point is our OL are charging the next level. If they miss one they keep going. And they cut because trying to get position with feet and quickness downfield is lower %.

I also think that on some plays, the mlb is 5+ yds back as we're looking to engage.

Thats true so what youll see is a few different schemes designed to create different angles. My favorite is the midline loop that we dont usually run where the guard pulls around the ce ter to get to the playside mike while we run midkine behind it. If executed right its a 5 yard guarantee if the mike is that far back
 

knoxjacket

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
855
Given the fact that continuous low intensity head impacts are turning brains into mush we should probably encourage, rather than ban, blocking below the waist.

Better to have bad knees in old age than CTE.
 

TromboneJacket

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
859
Location
Seattle, WA
Given the fact that continuous low intensity head impacts are turning brains into mush we should probably encourage, rather than ban, blocking below the waist.

Better to have bad knees in old age than CTE.
I agree. Not being able to walk would suck, but the idea of permanent brain damage gives me the same visceral fear as the idea of death.
 
Top