davesbrain
Georgia Tech Fan
- Messages
- 38
I now know how the river city folks felt, it's year 3 and it's apparent that professor hill's musical instruments are not going to arrive...
It was weird watching last night because I thought the same thing. He had 1 or 2 nice runs, but he got tripped up and solo tackled a lot last night. Where that was not happening last year. Mason ran hard and was having some success, would have liked to see Dante more when Gibbs was getting tripped up so much.On a side note, it is worth noting that Gibbs looked below average. Even when he started running he looked half the speed as last year. Maybe they bottled him up. But it was concerning that our best player didn’t even make it interesting
Thats what happens when you have a crummy offensive game plan....but you know...good players more than make up for poor coaching. At least that was the narrative around here for the past two years.Mason and Smith were more effective (and we barely saw Smith). Gibbs looked mediocre.
I agree he didn’t seem to have that extra burst or half step that would have let him break one or two. Gibbs was still very effective running at the start of the game but mason seemed to be more effective later. Still having two guys rush for 195 yds and average 5.5 yds per carry should have produced better results.On a side note, it is worth noting that Gibbs looked below average. Even when he started running he looked half the speed as last year. Maybe they bottled him up. But it was concerning that our best player didn’t even make it interesting
Fire him now and we probably lose a lot of his recruits. Don’t get me wrong, the way the program is headed we probably lose them anyway. It’s a pickle.I thought we were starting football season, but I see it's just the circus in town again.
If we are winless after we play Duke, Collins should be fired on the spot - like via his headset before he takes it off to go the locker room. Talent will hit the transfer portal or commit elsewhere regardless, retaining Collins to try and keep those guys around/committed is a waste of resources and will only allow the program to sink deeper.
You never keep a coach just to save a recruiting class, especially in the transfer portal era.Fire him now and we probably lose a lot of his recruits. Don’t get me wrong, the way the program is headed we probably lose them anyway. It’s a pickle.
I agree with you - losing next week or just having a 2 win season; we need to show we prioritize winning regardless of the cost.The money never makes sense to do a buyout - and yet teams do it, because there’s a point where the long term damage outweighs the short term cost. We’re not at that point yet. Lose to KSU ? I think you’re there. Have a 1-2 win season, which seems very possible now, and I think you are there. But then I said it last year too (about this coming season). Willie Taggart had a better outlook than CGC does right now.
Which was obviously not what I recommended. My point was that we may have to just “get over” our good recruiting under Collins because we are probably losing them regardless -unless we see a drastic turnaround.You never keep a coach just to save a recruiting class, especially in the transfer portal era.
Just like in business, there is nothing more expensive than a bad hire…. The cost and the opportunity cost of the time you spend with the bad hire can really impact an org’s results. We’re there and yes, that does fall to the AD. (The money donors who didn’t want that high school offense anymore will get away scott free)…There are good coaches out there that are not getting paid millions of dollars. Without looking up the guy's name, I have no idea who the head coach of UNI is. I'm pretty sure he doesn't make the same money as our million dollar coach does, but he sure did have his team prepared to play football. I think Mr. Collins a good man and has good intentions. However, this is a Todd Stansbury issue. The football program is dying a slow death and his job is to keep that from happening and make it whole. In my opinion, I don't think he is a good AD.
To jgtengineer:
If you'll look at the under performers who came with him from Navy you'll find that your statement isn't accurate. Recruiting was the last staff's major issue. At Navy the entire student body is eligible to be scholarship athletes. Recruiting at Navy is different than at a P5 school in the SE. Coach McCollum was a good recruiter, but he didn't come from Navy. The guys who did were not good recruiters in the P5 conference environment. The last staff needed at least 3 or 4 McCollums, but there was too much loyalty to the former Navy coaches. Gailey refused to hire a good OC. We'll see what happens with the current group. Can Collins be as good of a GM with the coaches as he is with the kids?
But I agree that we have to get off some money. Clemson had 2 offensive coaches making 7 figures until one left for a HC job. Alabama hires former NFL head coaches as assistants.
Thanks for looking this up. I really think the play here is to pay up for a good OC. Win some games and make Geoff look better than he is with the thought of pawning him off on another program (TN could be a good candidate) without having to pay the buyout. This is kinda what investment capital companies do in business.Doing some digging into CGC’s contract will lead you to these facts…
+ 7 year deal worth 23.1 million
+ He is in year 3 currently, making 3.2 million
+ If he is fired within the first four years, he will get all 23.1 million.
+ If he is fired after year 4, he will get 2.4 per year for the years remaining on the 7 year contract.
In conclusion, if we fire him this year, we would fork out 13.8 million. If he is fired at the end of next season (at the end of 4 years) his buyout would be 7.2 million. He isn’t going to get fired this year; that’s a lot of money that I don’t think will be put up or raised. Financially, it’s smarter to wait until the end of next season to can him. That means we may have to deal with this for 23 more games….
We need and identity and a coach capable of doing more with lessSo, as we discuss changes and I certainly think it is an appropriate topic, one issue that does concern me is the ability to identify coaches who can be successful at GT GIVEN our constraints. As has been pointed out, Gailey could not find an OC (nor did he seem to want to), Paul churned through a couple of DC's with no luck. And both of these men were/are good FB minds. What (given our budget) is a successful strategy for hiring young and upcoming talent in this game? We have all seen the schools who churn coaches....without results to the bottom line. I want change if it comes to that but not just for the sake of making change and/or hoping to catch lightning in a bottle.