- Messages
- 12,283
- Location
- Marietta, GA
Final stats
Overall, Miles had a good game.
Ndongo's -17 +/- score though...
Overall, Miles had a good game.
Ndongo's -17 +/- score though...
Ndongo felt invisible all game, and Gapare ended up on the floor for a lot of minutes. Looked through the season and other than maybe UGA this was Baye's first truly bad game. I don't have a high basketball IQ so I can't tell if the injury was lingering or if it was just a bad matchup or what.Final stats
Overall, Miles had a good game.
Ndongo's -17 +/- score though...
You don’t even need to watch road games for this program. So much more time for activitiesWait….i th8nk I’ve seen that movie before…
Probably because the game ended around dinner time, as well as some wanting to watch the pieces of **** lose.Lack of comments 10+ minutes after the game is deafening.
Excellent post Root... Are you reading my mind? LOL. Lots of upside with this roster. Next year looks promising.A few thoughts.
Ndongo had one of his worst games this year. Hopefully that was just lingering impacts from his head injury. He just seemed off all game.
Dowuona does not have the skill necessary to be an effective ACC player. At 6'11" he misses more point blank shots that anyone I have ever seen. He sets really weak screens as well and is not a threat to roll to the basket.
Reeves had a terrible 1st half. Bad turnovers and decision making. CDS quickly sat him down for most of the first half. Good call by CDS. In the 2nd half Reves played much better. Message seemed to get through.
George is developing nicely this year. He is much more assertive now than in December. I like that he is looking for his shot more often and that his 3 point shooting has improved significantly.
Gapare - man if he can ever pull it all together he could be a major impact player. In the first half he had a couple of unreal blocks on 3 point shots closing out from 10 or so feet. A couple of his drives to the basket were jaw dropping until he missed a dunk, walked or missed the FTs. This offseason he needs to shoot 10s of thousands of FT and 3 point shots!
Claude has really given his all the past several games. He battles and scraps. He isn't tall enough to be a force under the basket offensively as he gets a lot of shots blocked from behind. Still I like his effort.
As and aside NCST has won their turnover battle in 18 of their 22 games. They have very good guard play. Of course most of the time they have 4 guards on the court.
Like most games this year we had opportunities to win but didn't do enough to actually win!
Spot on comment about how the team operates without George on the floor. They frankly appear lost on offense and not very connected on defense when he is on the bench.Roller coaster game from a spectator's perspective. Lots of stretches alternating between fist pumping and throwing a napkin at the TV screen.
We actually outshot them from the floor 41.4% to 37.7% and from three 40.7 to 29%. But due to a -8 turnover margin, they took 11 more field goal attempts than we did and we were minus 5 scoring from the stripe despite only a two shot differential.
We've had some drift in the players that are making positive impacts. Ndongo had a really bad game. But Gapare continues to emerge. Before the Carolina game, I had doubts whether he had an adequate feel for the game to be a good player. But in the last two games I see him really sticking his nose in the action. He's not efficient, but that can come. Gapare's play was my happy take-away from the game.
Scary thought of the day: what our team would look like if we had not recruited George. The team does not function well without him on the court. Watching to see how good he gets during his time at Tech is a big point of interest for me with the program right now.
12 turnovers in a high tempo game really isn't bad, but forcing only 4 is remarkable. And I bet that their points off of our live-ball turnovers probably accounts for the point differential in the game.Game summary: 12 turnovers to 4
Points of of turnovers were 4 - 18... Only 6 point loss, so w/o reviewing the play by play, I'd bet your right, especially if we could back out some of the FT they made in the last couple of minutes that helped provide the final spread.12 turnovers in a high tempo game really isn't bad, but forcing only 4 is remarkable. And I bet that their points off of our live-ball turnovers probably accounts for the point differential in the game.
yep, we are last in conf in forcing TOs. With our weak sloppy passes that led to easy baskets we gave the game away, even with a decent shooting game.12 turnovers in a high tempo game really isn't bad, but forcing only 4 is remarkable. And I bet that their points off of our live-ball turnovers probably accounts for the point differential in the game.
George is not necessarily an explosive player so the degree to which he impacts the game may not be obvious to everyone. But his impact becomes obvious when he is not on the floor. The team looks totally different when he is not in there.Spot on comment about how the team operates without George on the floor. They frankly appear lost on offense and not very connected on defense when he is on the bench.
He is playing about 30 ( 34 the last 5 games) minutes a game which is a heavy load for a freshman Point Guard. Averaging 10 (13 the past 5)points, 5 assists (6 the last 5) and 2 turnovers per game.
Clearly he is the most pleasant surprise on this year's team!
He had the best +/- line of any player on the team, so I guess he wasn't hurting the team that much....I must admit, from being at the game it looked like Gapare’s minutes really hurt us, especially for a stretch in the second half. His mistakes almost render him unplayable, but we’re so under-talented that I guess we let him develop with minutes.
Steve Nash is his heroGeorge is not necessarily an explosive player so the degree to which he impacts the game may not be obvious to everyone. But his impact becomes obvious when he is not on the floor. The team looks totally different when he is not in there.
There was not ton of tape on him out of high school, but what there was does not hint at the caliber of player we have. He looked like a pesky defender and a pass first guy with very limited scoring skills or explosiveness.
What we have is a player of unusual savvy. He must have the attitude and learning ability to soak-in what Stoudamire is teaching incredibly fast and to apply that on the floor in ACC games. He is not a finished product by any means, but the rate by which he improves, the manner in which he finds ways to impact the game is remarkable.
Stoudamire has intentionally checked his inclination to gush. "Nait is ascending," is all he said after the Carolina game.
George plays with a similar chip as Alvarado. He seems to love to play. But George is a much bigger player than Alvarado and is much further along compared to the Freshman Alvarado. I think his game IQ is ahead of his conditioning and skills development. If George gets stronger, he may be a Derron Williams type of PG or in the Jason Kidd mold, if readers will forgive the comparison.
What is the upside here? That is what I want to watch as we go along.