Supersizethatorder-mutt
Banned
- Messages
- 13,443
- Location
- Augusta, GA
SMDHI'd be praising my boss in the press too if he had just given me an undeserved two year contract extension.
SMDHI'd be praising my boss in the press too if he had just given me an undeserved two year contract extension.
Works ok at the benzI don't think having a bunch of drunks a 100 feet in the air with a 4 foot railing separating them from the pavement is such a great idea.
That's just a 3-foot railing. Must be saferWorks ok at the benz
I'd be praising my boss in the press too if he had just given me an undeserved two year contract extension.
Ah, that Tech degree does pay off, does it not?Raise the railing...
The extension was necessary. You always need your head coach to have AT LEAST 3-4 years left in order to maintain recruiting. Recruits see a coach with only 1 or 2 years left and say, "Why would I commit there? The AD clearly doesn't have confidence in him or he'd extend him to cover the length of my scholarship. The guy is going to be gone after my RS-Fr season." Whether you feel the extension was deserved or not, it's just how college atheltics work.I'd be praising my boss in the press too if he had just given me an undeserved two year contract extension.
Those seats will be where the uga fans will be when we play them, so no real loss.I don't think having a bunch of drunks a 100 feet in the air with a 4 foot railing separating them from the pavement is such a great idea.
Thats logic I just don't buy into. First I give these kids more credit than that. They understand its a business and a coach can be fired anytime or leave for another job (lets not forget CPJ was trying to talk to Tennessee and he consistently reminds us he could have taken jobs elsewhere). Second, in Tech's case this apparently only applies to head coaches since we fired a DC during recruiting season while his son was on the team. Finally it really can't be said about CPJ who has publicly talked about retiring at anytime. So does this mean our recruiting will suffer the closer he gets to 65? By your logic, he should say Ill coach forever. And yes I understand why the AD gave it to him. I only hope he is also thinking "Im going to give CPJ the resources he needs to win games but he doesn't get five years to start winning". Hopefully CPJ is successful enough here to retire on his own terms.The extension was necessary. You always need your head coach to have AT LEAST 3-4 years left in order to maintain recruiting. Recruits see a coach with only 1 or 2 years left and say, "Why would I commit there? The AD clearly doesn't have confidence in him or he'd extend him to cover the length of my scholarship. The guy is going to be gone after my RS-Fr season." Whether you feel the extension was deserved or not, it's just how college atheltics work.
All that verbage to say nothing.Thats logic I just don't buy into. First I give these kids more credit than that. They understand its a business and a coach can be fired anytime or leave for another job (lets not forget CPJ was trying to talk to Tennessee and he consistently reminds us he could have taken jobs elsewhere). Second, in Tech's case this apparently only applies to head coaches since we fired a DC during recruiting season while his son was on the team. Finally it really can't be said about CPJ who has publicly talked about retiring at anytime. So does this mean our recruiting will suffer the closer he gets to 65? By your logic, he should say Ill coach forever. And yes I understand why the AD gave it to him. I only hope he is also thinking "Im going to give CPJ the resources he needs to win games but he doesn't get five years to start winning". Hopefully CPJ is successful enough here to retire on his own terms.
Thats logic I just don't buy into. First I give these kids more credit than that. They understand its a business and a coach can be fired anytime or leave for another job (lets not forget CPJ was trying to talk to Tennessee and he consistently reminds us he could have taken jobs elsewhere). Second, in Tech's case this apparently only applies to head coaches since we fired a DC during recruiting season while his son was on the team. Finally it really can't be said about CPJ who has publicly talked about retiring at anytime. So does this mean our recruiting will suffer the closer he gets to 65? By your logic, he should say Ill coach forever. And yes I understand why the AD gave it to him. I only hope he is also thinking "Im going to give CPJ the resources he needs to win games but he doesn't get five years to start winning". Hopefully CPJ is successful enough here to retire on his own terms.
It won't bother them. Most of them will think they can fly anyhow.I don't think having a bunch of drunks a 100 feet in the air with a 4 foot railing separating them from the pavement is such a great idea.
42"That's just a 3-foot railing. Must be safer
Do we know for a fact he was trying for a Tennessee interview? I have seen it as common wisdom, but nobody has actually said they know it for a fact and here's how. And the "consistently" reminding us of other offers, again I am not disputing you because I don't know. But the only reference to that I can recall was several years ago when Auburn came open and Johnson was somehow mentioned and somewhere in that context as I remember it he said he had been offered other jobs. But that is the only time I recall it.Thats logic I just don't buy into. First I give these kids more credit than that. They understand its a business and a coach can be fired anytime or leave for another job (lets not forget CPJ was trying to talk to Tennessee and he consistently reminds us he could have taken jobs elsewhere). Second, in Tech's case this apparently only applies to head coaches since we fired a DC during recruiting season while his son was on the team. Finally it really can't be said about CPJ who has publicly talked about retiring at anytime. So does this mean our recruiting will suffer the closer he gets to 65? By your logic, he should say Ill coach forever. And yes I understand why the AD gave it to him. I only hope he is also thinking "Im going to give CPJ the resources he needs to win games but he doesn't get five years to start winning". Hopefully CPJ is successful enough here to retire on his own terms.
The extension was necessary. You always need your head coach to have AT LEAST 3-4 years left in order to maintain recruiting. Recruits see a coach with only 1 or 2 years left and say, "Why would I commit there? The AD clearly doesn't have confidence in him or he'd extend him to cover the length of my scholarship. The guy is going to be gone after my RS-Fr season." Whether you feel the extension was deserved or not, it's just how college atheltics work.
If he didn't earn it then it wasn't necessary. And missing out on bowl games isn't earning it. What was necessary is for someone to put a fire under Johnson's backside and send an actual message that losing seasons and missing bowls isn't acceptable. Instead the opposite happened. Our AD acted like we made the championship game last year, allowed Johnson to scapegoat another DC, and in general mad every excuse he could for the recent failures in our football program.
And which P5 program are you or have been the AD for? In other words why should we think you have a clue about what you're talking about other than your well known dislike for PJ and his offense?
Did you ask that about people who called for Roof's firing?
Show me where Roof accomplished anything as a coach approaching what PJ has done and you might have a point.