$$$$I don't see how it would benefit Dabbo to leave Clemson unless there are some personal family needs in Alabama; he is definitely on top in salary at Clemson and loved by the fans there. Maybe, it is a wedge to get Saban to step down this year; he might possibly be swayed to return Alabama as head coach. Maybe, a lot of his family still lives in Alabama.
He is making 11.5 million a year. What would Auburn have to offer him? 15 million a year? At some point it probably isnt worth it.$$$$
i’m posting the “Fire _____” thread within 30 minutes of the hiring announcement. that way i get the most coveted prize in sports fandom, the “i told you so” postI'm going to get an early start.
I want to fire our new head coach after we hire him. That way we can talk about the next pick but let's keep it simple this time and only fire the new head coach and keep this AD a little while longer.
Bryce Koon is THE definition of fluff journalism, all opinion, no facts or sources
Maybe he wants a new challenge? Maybe he hates AU and wants to destroy them from the inside out? Maybe Clemson is tired of him?He is making 11.5 million a year. What would Auburn have to offer him? 15 million a year? At some point it probably isnt worth it.
Maybe he just wants Clemson to tell him again how much he is loved... and say it with a few more $$$, please.Maybe he wants a new challenge? Maybe he hates AU and wants to destroy them from the inside out? Maybe Clemson is tired of him?
If you can get 5*'s (and thus 4*'s) you have a chance to win national titles. If you don't, you have no chance at winning national titles. It's that simple. Of course you gotta have a good scheme, develop players, culture, etc./all that bs, but you don't have to be the best at that if you have top notch players. Deion is pulling in 5*'s in one of the worst areas of the country. I assume wherever he goes at the P5 level, he'll bring in even more 4 and 5*'s.Where do you get that deions ceiling is national titles? He is the least proven candidate
Dude, unless I am sadly mistaken, he has recruited a GRAND TOTAL of 1 5* guy there. In fact, he has FAR more transfers that HS recruits (15 vs 8 in 2022 class, 19 vs 13 in the 2021 class). Overall recruiting ranking of #62 in the country in 2021 and #75 in the country in 2022 class. For 2023 he has nothing above a 3* guy thus far and is ranked 105 in the country. He is recruiting better than they used to recruit and better than other HBCU schools, but let's not go overboard about his recruiting please.If you can get 5*'s (and thus 4*'s) you have a chance to win national titles. If you don't, you have no chance at winning national titles. It's that simple. Of course you gotta have a good scheme, develop players, cultre, etc./all that bs, but you don't have to be the best at that if you have top notch players. Deion is pulling in 5*'s in one of the worst areas of the country. I assume wherever he goes at the P5 level, he'll bring in even more 4 and 5*'s.
Dude, unless I am sadly mistaken, he has recruited a GRAND TOTAL of 1 5* guy there. In fact, he has FAR more transfers that HS recruits (15 vs 8 in 2022 class, 19 vs 13 in the 2021 class). Overall recruiting ranking of #62 in the country in 2021 and #75 in the country in 2022 class. For 2023 he has nothing above a 3* guy thus far and is ranked 105 in the country. He is recruiting better than they used to recruit and better than other HBCU schools, but let's not go overboard about his recruiting please.
I just report the facts. Sorry the facts don't fit with a lot of the opinions on this board--and most posts are just opinions. I simply report the inconsistencies between fact and opinion. My posts are always backed up with facts. It's amazing how the facts offend people.man for someone who hates and puts down anything Tech accomplished over the last 14 years, why even be a fan?
There are facts, and then there are cherry picking stats. Why stop at 9 years? Why not 8. Why not 10? Who picks 9 years and drives a narrative from that.I don't believe Paul Johnson's .500 FBS record over the last 9 years of his tenure was acceptable (and only 3 of those 9 were winning records vs FBS). When I see posts holding him out as the standard for a new coach, I object. With facts to support my view.
I want to do better. Does that make me a bad fan?
You tell us were you happy when we hired CGC ?I just report the facts. Sorry the facts don't fit with a lot of the opinions on this board--and most posts are just opinions. I simply report the inconsistencies between fact and opinion. My posts are always backed up with facts. It's amazing how the facts offend people.
I don't believe Paul Johnson's .500 FBS record over the last 9 years of his tenure was acceptable (and only 3 of those 9 were winning records vs FBS). When I see posts holding him out as the standard for a new coach, I object. With facts to support my view.
I want to do better. Does that make me a bad fan?
Because recruiting is a big part of coaching. The team that Johnson inherited from Gailey was probably the most talented team ever to play at GT. Johnson didn't recruit them and went 20-7. He then went .500 FBS for the remainder of his tenure with his recruits. The team Johnson left behind--considering that it was recruited for the run option and lost 8 D starters--was one of the least talented for a "normal" P5 offense ever.There are facts, and then there are cherry picking stats. Why stop at 9 years? Why not 8. Why not 10? Who picks 9 years and drives a narrative from that.
“Does that make me a bad fan?” No, but I doubt you’re fun a parties.
Actually I was. Collins was the main force behind the 2007 recruiting class, and we needed someone who could recruit given what Johnson (didn't) leave behind, and the change in offense. He also went to bowl games his prior 2 years as HC and was nominated for the Broyles award at both MissStateU and UF. The task of trying to rebuild the program turned out to be more than he could handle--although I'm not sure who could have handled it. The experts all said that the transition from the option would be a huge one--and that's ignoring the 8 starters lost on D from a D that wasn't that good. When that assertion turned out to be true, Tech fans acted as if they were shocked and blamed Collins.You tell us were you happy when we hired CGC ?
Because recruiting is a big part of coaching. The team that Johnson inherited from Gailey was probably the most talented team ever to play at GT. Johnson didn't recruit them and went 20-7. He then went .500 FBS for the remainder of his tenure with his recruits. The team Johnson left behind--considering that it was recruited for the run option and lost 8 D starters--was one of the least talented for a "normal" P5 offense ever.
Don't you think that 9 consecutive years is a pretty good statistical view? That's not cherry picking. It's comparing oranges to oranges. 9 years of primarily Johnson recruits.
Once again, I give facts. Did you? No, you just throw out a criticism. Sorry that the facts don't fit your opinion. I can't help that.
Collins was the main force behind the 2007 recruiting class,
While I agree CPJ left a team that was devoid of talent, I also acknowledge that it is my opinion and not "a fact."Because recruiting is a big part of coaching. The team that Johnson inherited from Gailey was probably the most talented team ever to play at GT. Johnson didn't recruit them and went 20-7. He then went .500 FBS for the remainder of his tenure with his recruits. The team Johnson left behind--considering that it was recruited for the run option and lost 8 D starters--was one of the least talented for a "normal" P5 offense ever.
Don't you think that 9 consecutive years is a pretty good statistical view? That's not cherry picking. It's comparing oranges to oranges. 9 years of primarily Johnson recruits.
Once again, I give facts. Did you? No, you just throw out a criticism. Sorry that the facts don't fit your opinion. I can't help that.