Is it just me or has some of the nuances of speaking about individual players changed a little bit since last year? It seems like the word “starter” has been used several times when various coaches are talking about certain positions where as last year it was almost unheard or even balked at stating that at roughly paraphrasing that there aren’t any starters at GT only “ATL” and there was a HUGE emphasis of saying that everyone who was “ATL” would get reps in a game. Did they determine that it wasn’t possible to sustain it? Was it only used last year to motivate or are they just late in completing the “ATL” roster because of the complications related to reduced reps due to COVID-19. I am also a little surprised about them gushing over Gibbs so much publicly. It’s honestly easy to see what a Special Talent he is. It’s refreshing to hear (as it was demonstrated during his recruiting process) that he’s hungry and humble with a outstanding work ethic. So that’s very Refreshing! Why not keep it more close to their vest and internal to the team and let the kid surprise FSU on the field. It would seem to me that it may also make Gibbs feel like it’s his already. Just some observations/questions. I can’t imagine the pressure/distraction/workloads on the coaches of trying to keep everything balanced (football, school, personal life, politics, CO-VID 19 policies/guidelines, social justice issues). All while evaluating current players, recruiting, and preparing to play against FSU. How do you keep the 18-23 (24) kids minds focused on the task at hand and keep those emotions in check when opinions vary? Hoping for the best 2020-2021 season can be. Go Jackets!