RonJohn
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 5,049
So you aren't providing any information on the financial statements that prove that GT Athletics has the money available to pay the buyout? Instead you want to justify the expense even though the money is not available? There are plenty of people who have bad roofs on their house and can't afford to replace the roof and can't finance it either. It is definitely more expensive to keep the bad roof and suffer water damage to the structure of the house than it is to replace the roof. However, I haven't met a roofing contractor that will provide a roof for free.I’ve posted before the reason why at the end of last season Collins the value of his buyout was essentially the same for then, end of this season and end of next season. It’s not just the size of the buyout it’s the diminishing revenue and the amount of years and ensuing financial damage to repair digging a deeper ditch. It was the whole financial premise behind the movement to replace him in December. It’s essentially a wash. Stansbury made a choice to give him another year and is hoping for the best.
If you can find money in the financial statements that is available to pay the buyout and hire a good new coach, I am extremely interested in looking at it. Otherwise, I don't really care about numbers that somebody heard, inferred, or read on a message board. In fact, I don't really care about the interpretations of the public statements from the athletic association. The AI2020 campaign was successful, but it included endowment grants and pledges for future money. There was not an infusion of $175 million in cash to the athletic association. Please find a one time infusion of $38 million in the balance books and point it out to me. I have looked and have not seen it.