Game 4 #GTvsWF Postgame

[leatherneckjacket]

Unlike the NFL, not every touchdown is reviewed in college football. I am not a college football ref, but my non expert opinion is that it would have overturned if it had been reviewed.

 

[MWBATL]

Unlike the NFL, not every touchdown is reviewed in college football. I am not a college football ref, but my non expert opinion is that it would have overturned if it had been reviewed.

It was my understanding that all touchdowns in ACC games were booth reviewed.

 

[leatherneckjacket]

It was my understanding that all touchdowns in ACC games were booth reviewed.

I have never heard of this nor can I find anything on the interwebs that says the ACC reviews all touchdowns.

 

[Augusta_Jacket]

He did. To me, he had control between his arms. As he pulled it to his belly, then ball moved. This DOES NOT constitute loss of control. The refs agreed.

We will disagree here. I am thankful the booth chose not to review it.

 

[orientalnc]

I agree. I am also happy it was called a catch on the field. There's nothing about the replay that's conclusive.

 

[GaTech4ever]

I missed the game.Who got all those penalties--OFF,DEf? who? and what for?

Kyle Kennard accounted for over 1/3 of our team’s penalties (4/11).

 

[Augusta_Jacket]

Kyle Kennard accounted for over 1/3 of our team’s penalties (4/11).

We had 14 penalties.

 

[slugboy]

We had 14 penalties.

I would still play him. He made plays.

 

[Augusta_Jacket]

I would still play him. He made plays.

I'd play the heck out of him. I was merely correcting the penalty count.

 

[LargeFO]

I would still play him. He made plays.

No way you don’t. He’s the best end. Key said he talked with him a couple times about channeling emotion better.

 

[MWBATL]

I have never heard of this nor can I find anything on the interwebs that says the ACC reviews all touchdowns.

For plays inside the two-minute warning of each half, all plays during overtime, scoring plays (since 2011), and turnovers (since 2012), reviews can take place only if the replay official, who sits in the press box and monitors the network broadcast of the game, determines that a play needs review;

 

[MWBATL]

For plays inside the two-minute warning of each half, all plays during overtime, scoring plays (since 2011), and turnovers (since 2012), reviews can take place only if the replay official, who sits in the press box and monitors the network broadcast of the game, determines that a play needs review;

 

[MWBATL]

I have never heard of this nor can I find anything on the interwebs that says the ACC reviews all touchdowns.

Sorry, meant to quote this:
Replay officials review all challenges, all scoring plays (including open-field plays that could have resulted in a touchdown), all unsuccessful convert attempts, and turnovers stemming from fumbles or interceptions.

 

[forensicbuzz]

We will disagree here. I am thankful the booth chose not to review it.

who said the booth didn't review it? It doesn't take long to look at the back endzone footage and clearly see that that there's nothing to see. Had they thought there was something there, they would have stopped play. There's no doubt in my mind they reviewed it and decided it didn't need any further look.

 

[Augusta_Jacket]

who said the booth didn't review it? It doesn't take long to look at the back endzone footage and clearly see that that there's nothing to see. Had they thought there was something there, they would have stopped play. There's no doubt in my mind they reviewed it and decided it didn't need any further look.

They announce reviews. They didn't announce a review. Like I said, I am thankful they didn't.

 

[forensicbuzz]

They announce reviews. They didn't announce a review. Like I said, I am thankful they didn't.

They actually don't announce reviews. They announce when the booth sends them back down for review on the field, but they 100% do NOT announce all the booth reviews. The booth reviews almost every play that MIGHT be questionable.

 

[Vespid]

They announce reviews. They didn't announce a review. Like I said, I am thankful they didn't.

They announce " further" reviews. Every scoring play is reviewed.

Every game has a head replay official with a crew. NCAA rules say they have to review every play of the game. They can stop a game whenever the crew head believes:

• There’s “reasonable evidence to believe an error was made in the initial on-field ruling”
• The play is reviewable
• The outcome of a review would “have a direct, competitive impact” on the game”

 

[Augusta_Jacket]

They actually don't announce reviews. They announce when the booth sends them back down for review on the field, but they 100% do NOT announce all the booth reviews. The booth reviews almost every play that MIGHT be questionable.

So we should be thankful they didn't take the time to review this further.

 

[forensicbuzz]

So we should be thankful they didn't take the time to review this further.

I hear what you're saying. I don't agree, but, that's okay. It was a TD. I think they got it right. I think the booth looked at it and agreed the refs on the field got it right. I also believe, had they looked at it for an hour, the outcome would have been the same.

It seems you don't feel the same way. That, too, is valid. But, we're on to Bowling Green now!!!! Go Jackets.

 

[GaTech4ever]

We had 14 penalties.

I must have only been looking at offense (3) and defense (8)