Film Study - Offense vs NCST

Boomergump

Helluva Engineer
Featured Member
Messages
3,262
It is really hard for me to decide where to begin this week. On one hand, I want to be careful not to exaggerate the level of our domination against this opponent in fear of fomenting false hope and unrealistic expectations. But on the other hand, I want to give credit where credit is due. In the five or so years that I have been doing these type of reports, I have never seen us dominate an FBS opponent this way on the offensive side of the ball. In watching this game unfold, I honestly feel like I could have been calling plays on the sideline and everything would have worked out fine. It is just hard for things not to work when your OL is driving people off the ball the way we did. There really wasn't but a single BIG PLAY (Synjin's run out) that I can think of. It was just that every tackle seemed to be made 3 yards further down the field than it looked like. The amount of backwards movement we were getting out of their guys up front made the line to gain on first down look like 5 yards instead of 10. That is really the story. To be truthful, I don't think a game like this could have come at a worse time for us. We are about to face a top notch D line with strength, quickness and agility next week. While we are a good unit up front, producing at unprecedented levels in the CPJ era, we are not THAT GOOD. If we start believing we are, THAT GOOD, then it might be a rude awakening at noon next Saturday. We gotta keep the edge that is created by a healthy level of fear.

The Pack came out lined up with 5 up front like UVA did some of the time. 2 LBs in the middle and a couple of safeties that obviously felt they could just run to the play side boundary with reckless abandon whenever they felt like it. At the first sign of AB motion, they were gone. They just kept doing it, even after getting repeatedly burned by the designed counter QB solo runs with the pulling backside G and T. I mean, they were leaving half the field open. How they thought CPJ wouldn't see that beats me.

There was some stuff we can clean up. JT made a couple bad give reads. SD ran to the wrong gap a couple times and we whiffed a few blocks. However, make no mistake we were in complete control and it never should be that easy.

Shaq is always good, but the amount of backwards movement he was getting out of DLs and LBs will certainly be embarrassing to them at weekly film study. Everybody was good up front. Griffin still looks hampered by something. I don't know what. Pass protection overall was solid, the few times we needed it.

Dennis Andrews caught my eye blocking the edge this week. He looks to be earning some extra time with solid effort.

I need to give Byerly some props. Many have mentioned on this board how good a back up he is, maybe the best we have had in a while. I want to say he is a good player, period. He is a starter quality QB in our system and we will be just fine if he needs to play extended time in crucial games. I really believe that. I have been so impressed with his play.

I could go on and on, but the truth of what happened is very simple. We killed them up front. End of story. The rest is just details. We got to play a lot of kids. That is great. We got some guys a little rest. That too is great. I just hope our heads didn't swell after this one.
 

Minawreck

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
623
I was wondering if this were going to be a one word post that just read:

DOMINATION.

Our O-Line is really good this season, don't worry too much about the "tune-up opponent". Recall Clemsons was Wake Forest and they just looked incredibly small and slow in TV.
 

GTNavyNuke

Helluva Engineer
Featured Member
Messages
9,920
Location
Williamsburg Virginia
I've watched Clempson and I don't believe their defensive front is that much better than Virginia's.

First, thanks Boomer.

Second, I agree only if you base that observation on the Wake game. I've seen the Clemson DL create a lot of havoc in other games; even FSU. Their DL is ranked 4th in the country for a good reason - this was before the Wake game and the stats may be updated when you check for games as of 11/8 for the Wake game that Clemson didn't play hard for at all ...... http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaadl

But UVa DL was ranked 9th, so we will see! And NC State 69th!
 

LongforDodd

LatinxBreakfastTacos
Messages
3,033
First, thanks Boomer.

Second, I agree only if you base that observation on the Wake game. I've seen the Clemson DL create a lot of havoc in other games; even FSU. Their DL is ranked 4th in the country for a good reason - this was before the Wake game and the stats may be updated when you check for games as of 11/8 for the Wake game that Clemson didn't play hard for at all ...... http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaadl

But UVa DL was ranked 9th, so we will see! And NC State 69th!

Vic Beasley, IMO, is the best DLinemen, and maybe the best athlete we have seen or will play against all year long. We'll have our hands full with him.
 

dressedcheeseside

Helluva Engineer
Messages
14,046
I worry about our heads swelling, too, but remember who the leader of the OL is.... Shaq. He's been around the block a time or two. Specifically, he's played the Tigers before, he knows how good they are and he know they ain't no NC State. You can bet he's busting his arse on the practice field and leading his mates in a like fashion. He's gonna be downplaying their play in the film room and chalking it up to poor play by the opponent.

We also have a gaggle of seniors at Aback who have gone to Death Valley twice in the last two years and lost. You can bet they know how to approach the coming week of practice. It's time to go to work, boys. I think they already know it.
 

Yoda

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,173
Location
Hartwell, GA
Not to get off subject by going back to Smelter, be he needs to be the one we show video of to our recruits/wr's on roster that this is how the position is supposed to be played in this offense.
 

ATL1

Helluva Engineer
Messages
7,377
My only complaint is that we didn't get Smelter & Waller more involved. I'd like to see Smelter get the yards per reception record.
 

Animal02

Banned
Messages
6,269
Location
Southeastern Michigan
First, thanks Boomer.

Second, I agree only if you base that observation on the Wake game. I've seen the Clemson DL create a lot of havoc in other games; even FSU. Their DL is ranked 4th in the country for a good reason - this was before the Wake game and the stats may be updated when you check for games as of 11/8 for the Wake game that Clemson didn't play hard for at all ...... http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaadl

But UVa DL was ranked 9th, so we will see! And NC State 69th!
Wasn't Pitt ranked 10th before we handled them?
 
Top