Northeast Stinger
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 11,153
I hate to admit now but I really thought we were on the way at that point and saw 7 wins as absolutely attainable.What I thought after the UNC game was, "We've turned the corner."
I hate to admit now but I really thought we were on the way at that point and saw 7 wins as absolutely attainable.What I thought after the UNC game was, "We've turned the corner."
Can you say “fugue it!”
Me, too, and I was still hopeful of at least a bowl game after Duke. Then the wheels came off.I hate to admit now but I really thought we were on the way at that point and saw 7 wins as absolutely attainable.
For what it’s worth, I thought that we needed to win the following week and have two back-to-back wins to be really turning the corner. The week after UNC needed the best coaching job of the year. It needed new wrinkles on offense and defense, and to build on the win. We didn't seem to roll out anything new for the following game, and had the train wreck against Pitt.
These two onsides against UVA were great though.
Seems pretty apparent to me.Do we know that? I'm not suggesting we do, but just asking.
Here is a rule that I follow which seems helpful. Don't compare coaches, players, teams, etc. from past eras with the present. It is a fool's errand at best.You would think that helped, but even Curry’s good years weren’t all that great. The tail end of Curry’s tenure overlapped my undergrad days.
He also had the advantage that his surrounding coaches weren’t all that innovative.
Even accounting for rule changes, I’d confidently put the top coaches of this era against the top coaches of the 70’s and 80’s. It’s a different era now, and coaching today is ahead of where it was even 20 years ago. There’s very little margin of error.
I do think there are outside experts that could help our coaches a lot. There are far more that would waste time and energy though—we’d need to be picky
More then you know. One reason Bama hired Curry was because he would bring with him Tech's computer programs and scouting methods used in recruiting. Nobody in this part of the country had anything like it at the time.The tail end of Curry’s tenure overlapped my undergrad days.
He also had the advantage that his surrounding coaches weren’t all that innovative.
I wish I thought this was enough. Imho, we need to find the Bill James clones and hire them. I would guess that young college coaches seldom have the educational background to plan data collection strategies, collect the data, and analyze it usefully. This is an area where football is eons behind baseball.Young college coaches that dig in to tech and use it at high competition level get better fast.
Agree.Me, too, and I was still hopeful of at least a bowl game after Duke. Then the wheels came off.
The coaching growth i am talking about is in the ability to see in real time whats happening all over the field . We have watch games for years. He does so much film study w his phone. Sends it to buddies and they talk txt. We were at a texas hs playoff game and he was answering txts from head coach on sidelines. Are they ready for they drawn up enough for the long bomb to the good wr- yes - next play bomb to wr. Young guys are learning fast. I have heard Cpj could see it all and remember every play.I wish I thought this was enough. Imho, we need to find the Bill James clones and hire them. I would guess that young college coaches seldom have the educational background to plan data collection strategies, collect the data, and analyze it usefully. This is an area where football is eons behind baseball.
Actually, I looked it up and the streak dates back to last year. Still, it's impressive, and our touchback ranking improved dramatically:Don't know if anyone mentioned this, but weren't we 5 for 5 in onside kicks? Has that ever happened before? I wonder if that's some kind of record.
So Jude Kelley 2021 MVP? I'm downActually, I looked it up and the streak dates back to last year. Still, it's impressive, and our touchback ranking improved dramatically:
Inside The Chart: Jude Perfect
Inside the art of the onside kick with Jude Kelley & the kickoff renaissance he’s helping lead at GTramblinwreck.com
Kelley has had five successful onside kicks in a row dating back to last season. The odds of that happening, according to The 33rd Team’s data?
Approximately 0.076%. That’s seven one-hundredths of one percent.
Touchback % – NCAA Ranking
2017: No. 124
2018: No. 102
2019: No. 130
2020: No. 92
2021: No. 36
I think he's in the top 5.So Jude Kelley 2021 MVP? I'm down