Northeast Stinger
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 10,769
Hey did anyone see that lineman tackle Efford to the ground on that long run that almost cost Tech the game !
I was.Where were you in 1971 when the chain broke?
Maybe the players were not conditioned to play in NC. Sure did look bad on TV for Tech.The GT defenders looked like frickin soccer players out there today! Embarrassing. Hope there is a rule change like sitting out the remainder of the series as mentioned.
Hadn’t thought of that. Any time you cross a state line it messes with the electrical impulses in your whole system.Maybe the players were not conditioned to play in NC. Sure did look bad on TV for Tech.
All teams do it that’s why I’m for making teams use a timeout or it’s a 10 yard penalty if anything holds up the game with less than 2 minutes remaining. All teams go into the game knowing the rules.First of all, hell of a finish to an amazing game to get to a 5-2 start.
However, I am so embarrassed to see Tech defensive players coordinating which one of them should fake an injury in this UNC game, on UNC's last scoring drive.
They did it multiple times. I am appalled. This is not "whatever it takes to win," it is cowardly, unsportsmanlike, and max cringe.
If the other team did it, I'd be up in arms, and I'm even more upset that we would do it.
As a proud double jacket alum and multi decade fan, I cannot endorse this brand of football. If I see them do this crap again, I will be incredibly disappointed.
Sarcasm’s a wonderful thing!Why not do it on every play? Always keep our defense fresh. If its towards the end of the game, have multiple players fall down but space it out so that when the first one gets off the field the second one realizes he is injured and then falls down. Let's even make it look bad by having the player carted off the field. Maybe have a prayer session for him. That takes a while. He could run back out shortly after that. We could eliminate the concept of a tired defense completely.
Yep. And I was right ticked when I did.Hey did anyone see that lineman tackle Efford to the ground on that long run that almost cost Tech the game !
I am in general a rules and order type of guy. I think that rules/laws should be written specifically to do specifically what they are intended to do. That way everybody can understand, and everybody can follow the rules/laws.It's reasonable to expect Tech to display more than the minimum level of class on the field. We maintain expectations above the minimum level of academics and character. If you consider those just a means to an end there's a university 70 miles away whose football program may better fit your priorities.
If you claim an exemption as written, for its intended purpose, then it's not cheating, it's following the law.Don't get mad at people/corporations for using the actual rules to their benefit. Get mad at the tax code and get it changed. Likewise, don't get mad at GT football for using the rules, as written, to their benefit. Get upset with the way the rules are written and push for change so that everyone plays under the same rules.
I said it isn't a perfect analogy. There was a lot of moral outrage about corporations operating in such a way as to exactly follow the tax law as written to avoid paying a large percentage of taxes. The public was not upset about the way the laws were written, they were upset that large corporations were using the law as written to their advantage.If you claim an exemption as written, for its intended purpose, then it's not cheating, it's following the law.
If you knowingly and willingly claim an exemption or advantage that you're not entitled to, or if you conceal a tax liability then it's not just your issue, it affects everyone else. And if you do it publicly in plain view under the name of an institution that many others have an interest in, then they have every right to be angry.
Faking injuries isn't the same as running a deceptive play or even trying to get away with a bit of extra contact. Athlete safety is a serious issue. Exploiting people's concern for it is callous and offensive.