I use this only as an analogy, but it is pretty apropos.
The left, when they want to shut down honest and respectful debate, they yell "racism", "bigot", or some other "ism".
When those who disliked PJ and his system here some of our GT families' concern for the future, they just use the word "negativism" or "negative" or "negativity" to try to shut it down, and in some cases, go to "name" calling. I don't agree with emotional and useless name calling on either side of the debate, but also those that are happy should ignore those of us who are concerned. If you disagree, state that respectively and why, and then leave it when both side disagree.
Again, these items that Mountain mentioned are facts (maybe they feel like "negative" facts" to those who are happy to see PJ go), but they REAL facts. Whether they hinder our success going forward is a debate that will be played out soon, but they have definitely hindered us historically, and they have both grown in their effectiveness against us.