TheSilasSonRising
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 3,729
No
The Flexbone is illegal in the NFL, you can't cut block. It's amusing because 999/1000 paid NFL analysts would probably trot out the old slogans about bigger, faster defenses etc (as if pro players aren't equally more athletic on both sides of the ball) and not realize that the reason nobody tries the Flex on that level is because the blocking isn't legal. If it were, you'd imagine a lot of teams would run it in packages on short yardage.
It's also possible that the New Mexico/Georgia Southern version could eventually reach the NFL since those blocking schemes are more upright. There would be a lot of long faces and vicious disapproval as when Tim Tebow introduced the Read-O, but there's no real reason it wouldn't be effective.
I guess I get the other things but really you think cut blocking is illegal in the NFL? If it is when did it change? I have not paid to much attention to the NFL in the last 5 to 6 years because I think its boring, but before that cutting is perfectly legal.ZHavenor --
Personally? I think they're afraid of losing fan interest. Visit your local bar and notice how many NFL fans are only concerned with how hard a tall, slow white man can stand in one spot and zing a football, or how high his favorite WR can jump. It's retarded and sad, but if your goal is to make maximum profit you have to encourage passing the ball and ignore football purists who are in the minority. So NFL rules, organizational focus, media etc. are all pretty much aligned vs. any innovations in the running game.
One of the overlooked aspects of "Tebowmania" was the level of bitterness and resentment (still ongoing) toward the 2011 Broncos for daring to run 50+ times a game and win that way. It went beyond differences of opinion. Analysts and opposing organizations were annoyed, even disgusted. I think everyone really thought it was the end of their lucrative paychecks if the league kept going in that direction.
These days the media strategy is to simply ignore the option play as if it doesn't exist or work in the NFL anymore. Last week on Inside The NFL, Boomer Esiason said "The zone-read is a bunch of crap, completely useless" but last time I checked, the Seahawks and Dolphins are murdering defenses with it 15+ times a game. It's almost creepy when you think about it. They count on the fans being deaf, dumb and blind...and most of them are.
As for injuries due to cut blocks, if cut blocks do cause extra knee or ankle injuries to occur then that's a much less corrupt reason for the rule. I suspect it's a little of both.
If CPJ goes am I the only person that thinks Roof would be the best option?
ZHavenor --
One of the overlooked aspects of "Tebowmania" was the level of bitterness and resentment (still ongoing) toward the 2011 Broncos for daring to run 50+ times a game and win that way. It went beyond differences of opinion. Analysts and opposing organizations were annoyed, even disgusted. I think everyone really thought it was the end of their lucrative paychecks if the league kept going in that direction.
Id personally want the Georgia southern head coach if paul left for some reason. We'd basically run our same offense but out of the shotgun. Players like Justin Thomas or Mathew Jordan would thrive in it. I want paul to stAy and keep doing what he's doing tho.
ZHavenor --
Personally? I think they're afraid of losing fan interest. Visit your local bar and notice how many NFL fans are only concerned with how hard a tall, slow white man can stand in one spot and zing a football, or how high his favorite WR can jump. It's retarded and sad, but if your goal is to make maximum profit you have to encourage passing the ball and ignore football purists who are in the minority. So NFL rules, organizational focus, media etc. are all pretty much aligned vs. any innovations in the running game.
One of the overlooked aspects of "Tebowmania" was the level of bitterness and resentment (still ongoing) toward the 2011 Broncos for daring to run 50+ times a game and win that way. It went beyond differences of opinion. Analysts and opposing organizations were annoyed, even disgusted. I think everyone really thought it was the end of their lucrative paychecks if the league kept going in that direction.
These days the media strategy is to simply ignore the option play as if it doesn't exist or work in the NFL anymore. Last week on Inside The NFL, Boomer Esiason said "The zone-read is a bunch of crap, completely useless" but last time I checked, the Seahawks and Dolphins are murdering defenses with it 15+ times a game. It's almost creepy when you think about it. They count on the fans being deaf, dumb and blind...and most of them are.
As for injuries due to cut blocks, if cut blocks do cause extra knee or ankle injuries to occur then that's a much less corrupt reason for the rule. I suspect it's a little of both.
Guys there is no way any program would go after CPJ. He won't leave here unless it is Bobinski making the call. But I do think we should definitely extend him at the end of this year if he wins 1 of UGA, ACCCG, or the Orange Bowl. If we end with 3 straight losses (those games) then we should hold off on an extension.
I'm not so sure about that. I think he will have plenty of options. Also, it will be really interesting trying to find a new coach after we refused to give an extension to a guy having one of the better seasons at GT in the last 50 years.Guys there is no way any program would go after CPJ. He won't leave here unless it is Bobinski making the call. But I do think we should definitely extend him at the end of this year if he wins 1 of UGA, ACCCG, or the Orange Bowl. If we end with 3 straight losses (those games) then we should hold off on an extension.
I guess I get the other things but really you think cut blocking is illegal in the NFL? If it is when did it change? I have not paid to much attention to the NFL in the last 5 to 6 years because I think its boring, but before that cutting is perfectly legal.
I think he deserves it after this season, no matter how it plays out from here. He took a team down double digit scholarship players and is 3-0 against the big 4, and finished at least tied for the division. He(and his staff) have done an amazing job, and even our losses were down to the wire. After this last off season, 9 wins through 11 games isn't good coaching, it's wizardry.Guys there is no way any program would go after CPJ. He won't leave here unless it is Bobinski making the call. But I do think we should definitely extend him at the end of this year if he wins 1 of UGA, ACCCG, or the Orange Bowl. If we end with 3 straight losses (those games) then we should hold off on an extension.