iceeater1969
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 9,628
Love your unbriddled optimism for sudden improvement in on field results.I think this coaching staff "gets" the players better. Players seem to be willing to fight for Collins more than Johnson.
Collins seems more involved, which in the long run, to me, means better player progression.
We needed a GM and a coach. Johnson was an OC posing as a HC with no GM involvement.
Collins being focused on branding already has hit the head on the nail for this program. We were an after thought to 99% of the nation as a BRAND. Everyone knows bama and Clemson football even if they don't follow college ball.
We need that here. Now. The complete lack of attention of that from Johnson is extremely concerning. Maybe it was an age thing, or a stuck in his ways thing.
Do I appreciate Johnson? Yes. Heck yes.
Am I glad we are on to a new era? Yes. Absolutely.
I fully expect to have 5 ACC appearances in the next 10 years and at least 2 playoff appearances.
We have higher academic standards, more limited tech heave curriculum, only college admin that has cash cow research dept that dwarfs gt athletics.
With those limits one would think we would hire and pay "way" above average coaches.
The teams u are talking about us beating have top paid assistant coaches. imo, the one coach that we should have always paid top $ is strength coach. If you search for " ncaa college football strength coaches , you will see coach Sisk is ranked by salary at about # 60. Sure its possible the new strantgh coach we hired is a diamond we found at "buffalo". Sisk has moved to Ga state. Look where we got most of the new staff - smaller schools like North Texas, Temple, etc.
I hope we can win early, get buzz at bds, raise donations, so we can $$ up this staff. Otherwise , we will be shopping the g5 teams for another staff after these guys move up.
When have ever paid "extra" to overcome our "extra" limitations?
Hope we do this time.