CFB25 Video Game: images revealed of GT stadium, mascots, traditions

DH9387

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
276
Location
Kaneohe, HI
anyone creating an Online Dynasty League? PS5
The Crowded Booth is hosting an Online Dynasty for PS5.

Same here but Xbox. Do we know if they support cross-play online dynasties?
They are supporting cross-play for match play but not for Online Dynasty. I have an Xbox and would love to join an Online Dynasty if there are enough interested people on here to start one.
 

apatriot1776

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
734

I don't have the game yet, but this is the first time I'm seeing the ratings. Man it sticks out to me that our offensive line is criminally underrated. Transfer Keylan Rutledge is the only lineman rated 80 or above. Also shocking that Jordan Van den berg is rated over Zeek Biggers and Romello Height is our highest rated overall on defense while both safeties are borderline 70s.

In general it seems there is major, major disrespect for last season's roster. We're tied for the lowest-rated team in the ACC (GT 80, UVA 80, Pitt 80, Stanford 82, Cal 82, BC 84, Wake 84) and the above transfers are the only thing keeping us from being rated in the 70s.
 

ThatGuy

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,029
Location
Evergreen, CO

I don't have the game yet, but this is the first time I'm seeing the ratings. Man it sticks out to me that our offensive line is criminally underrated. Transfer Keylan Rutledge is the only lineman rated 80 or above. Also shocking that Jordan Van den berg is rated over Zeek Biggers and Romello Height is our highest rated overall on defense while both safeties are borderline 70s.

In general it seems there is major, major disrespect for last season's roster. We're tied for the lowest-rated team in the ACC (GT 80, UVA 80, Pitt 80, Stanford 82, Cal 82, BC 84, Wake 84) and the above transfers are the only thing keeping us from being rated in the 70s.
Agreed.

I think the silver lining for me is that since we now live in a much more connected age than 10 years ago when the last NCAA FB game came out, I expect to see ratings updates throughout the season as players and teams establish themselves.

I'm hoping our onfield play will lead to some major revisions as the season goes on.
 

AugustaSwarm

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
921

I don't have the game yet, but this is the first time I'm seeing the ratings. Man it sticks out to me that our offensive line is criminally underrated. Transfer Keylan Rutledge is the only lineman rated 80 or above. Also shocking that Jordan Van den berg is rated over Zeek Biggers and Romello Height is our highest rated overall on defense while both safeties are borderline 70s.

In general it seems there is major, major disrespect for last season's roster. We're tied for the lowest-rated team in the ACC (GT 80, UVA 80, Pitt 80, Stanford 82, Cal 82, BC 84, Wake 84) and the above transfers are the only thing keeping us from being rated in the 70s.
I'm shocked that Haynes F'ing King is only an 83. This is some free bulletin board material...we had one of the best OL in the ACC last year, and none of them are ranked in the 80's?????
 

Golden Tornadoes

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
838

I don't have the game yet, but this is the first time I'm seeing the ratings. Man it sticks out to me that our offensive line is criminally underrated. Transfer Keylan Rutledge is the only lineman rated 80 or above. Also shocking that Jordan Van den berg is rated over Zeek Biggers and Romello Height is our highest rated overall on defense while both safeties are borderline 70s.

In general it seems there is major, major disrespect for last season's roster. We're tied for the lowest-rated team in the ACC (GT 80, UVA 80, Pitt 80, Stanford 82, Cal 82, BC 84, Wake 84) and the above transfers are the only thing keeping us from being rated in the 70s.
Maybe it’s just me but I didn’t see Leo Blackburn on that list at all. For those with early access, is he in the game?
 

bke1984

Helluva Engineer
Messages
3,609
I’ve played it a few times the past couple days. Our offense should be much better, but I’m actually more upset that all the damn buttons seem to have changed. The give/keep on options plays is the opposite of what it used to be - counter intuitive that you have to hit a button to keep. Oh well, I’ll figure it out.

Now get off my lawn!
 

RamblinCharger

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,541
Location
Alabama
I've spent several hours playing already. I love the game, it's really nostalgic and I think overall they made a good game, but the GT playbook stinks and our roster is probably the most underrated in the entire game. Our recruiting talent composite is 5th or 6th in the ACC, but we're last in the league in ratings? The defense was poor last year, I'd be fine with a 78/80 on defense, but the offense should be 85-86 or so making the team an 83-84 overall. King, Rutherford, and the OL got robbed.
 

HurricaneJacket

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,823
I've spent several hours playing already. I love the game, it's really nostalgic and I think overall they made a good game, but the GT playbook stinks and our roster is probably the most underrated in the entire game. Our recruiting talent composite is 5th or 6th in the ACC, but we're last in the league in ratings? The defense was poor last year, I'd be fine with a 78/80 on defense, but the offense should be 85-86 or so making the team an 83-84 overall. King, Rutherford, and the OL got robbed.
Haven't played yet, but the o-line seems criminally underrated in the streams I've seen
 

majorQ9

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
370
Here's your chance to help EA Sports fix the issues with Tech in the game.


Issues I submitted were the marching band needs to have white uniforms and to have White and Gold play after a touchdown and Ramblin Wreck play after the extra point (it's reversed in the game for some reason)
 

roadkill

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,928
I've spent several hours playing already. I love the game, it's really nostalgic and I think overall they made a good game, but the GT playbook stinks and our roster is probably the most underrated in the entire game. Our recruiting talent composite is 5th or 6th in the ACC, but we're last in the league in ratings? The defense was poor last year, I'd be fine with a 78/80 on defense, but the offense should be 85-86 or so making the team an 83-84 overall. King, Rutherford, and the OL got robbed.
I don't have the game so I'm not familiar with its mechanics, but I assume from your post that each team's offense and defense has a separate rating. Our offense was 4th in the ACC last year by OFEI, a little behind Louisville but ahead of teams like Miami, Virginia Tech, and well ahead of Clemson. 33rd overall out of 131. Where does the game place our offense compared to others in the ACC?
 

bke1984

Helluva Engineer
Messages
3,609
King is too slow and is rated a bad passer for someone he can make the throws he can.

Kyle Efford isn’t even in the game as best I can tell.

I’m not sure what to say about how bad our O line is. It’s just ridiculous.
 
Top