forensicbuzz
21st Century Throwback Dad
- Messages
- 8,833
- Location
- North Shore, Chicago
I guess I should have highlighted the part that I was saying was silly. Not the concept, in general, but "the potential trade off of a missed bowl game is not even on their radar this week," in specific.I am not saying they would turn down an opportunity or funding. The question originally post was valid… Why is there a bowl taking a 5-7 team when one of the academies could have six wins?
I took issue with a reply that said the Bowls shouldn’t have to wait. To me, it seemed to uphold the bowl selection as some noble institution not to be inconvenienced by the silly academies. (that was not the posters intent, we don’t need to go back there.)
The fact is, the bowls don’t wait, they aren’t being asked to wait, and the academies don’t care nearly as much about bowl prospects as they do this upcoming weekend. It’s more important for them to play this game on this day in this manner.
I should be more clear. Sorry. I believe they very much care and in this particular instance probably spent much time weighing the consequences.