AlabamaBuzz
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,020
- Location
- Hartselle, AL (originally Rome, GA)
3 thoughts:
1.) Obviously people in AA read this site and other GT boards bc there has been tons of whining about not hearing from AD
2.) It's never a good sign when your AD has to come out and answer these types of questions. Next year is make or break for PJ
3.) Interesting take on Vad transfer that it did NOT surprise him. Folks get ready for a lot of triple option football again.
You actually know people who are saying we should be happy with 6-7 wins?I think it's interesting that Gaudin verbalized "6-7" wins and that given GT's environment some people think we should be happy with that.
I think it's interesting that Gaudin verbalized "6-7" wins and that given GT's environment some people think we should be happy with that. Bobinski was pretty vocal about it not being acceptable. Bobinski also commented several times about improving the program as it is, getting better results than we have. He wants our athletic programs to match our academic success as an Insitution.
My view on their meeting is Bobinski made it known what his expectations of the program are, and CPJ made it known what he needed from the Ath. Dept. to reach those expectations. I believe Bobinski will try his best to provide CPJ with want the staff needs, but in return he's going to expect better results. How CPJ gets those results (running a "triple option" offense, recruiting philosophy, etc.) doesn't matter as much to him as it means to the fans, but at the end of the day he'll want better results. I also believe Bobinski is going to give CPJ more time to get there than some fans want to give CPJ.
Fair enough. The main thing I got from the interview is that Bobinski believes GT football should do better, and can do better. I really think Bobinski wants to improve the flagship program regardless of who the coach is. As a GT fan, I was very happy with that interview and his vision of our program.
I liked the interview too. One of my favorite comments he made was in regards to not making decisions driven by emotion. Emotion is great, along with passion etc, but you need a level head to make the proper decisions when it comes to running a program or an athletic department.I think it's interesting that Gaudin verbalized "6-7" wins and that given GT's environment some people think we should be happy with that. Bobinski was pretty vocal about it not being acceptable. Bobinski also commented several times about improving the program as it is, getting better results than we have. He wants our athletic programs to match our academic success as an Insitution.
My view on their meeting is Bobinski made it known what his expectations of the program are, and CPJ made it known what he needed from the Ath. Dept. to reach those expectations. I believe Bobinski will try his best to provide CPJ with want the staff needs, but in return he's going to expect better results. How CPJ gets those results (running a "triple option" offense, recruiting philosophy, etc.) doesn't matter as much to him as it means to the fans, but at the end of the day he'll want better results. I also believe Bobinski is going to give CPJ more time to get there than some fans want to give CPJ.
Fair enough. The main thing I got from the interview is that Bobinski believes GT football should do better, and can do better. I really think Bobinski wants to improve the flagship program regardless of who the coach is. As a GT fan, I was very happy with that interview and his vision of our program.
You actually know people who are saying we should be happy with 6-7 wins?
This is a touchy subject, I won't make any assumptions here.
3 thoughts:
1.) Obviously people in AA read this site and other GT boards bc there has been tons of whining about not hearing from AD
2.) It's never a good sign when your AD has to come out and answer these types of questions. Next year is make or break for PJ
3.) Interesting take on Vad transfer that it did NOT surprise him. Folks get ready for a lot of triple option football again.
I gotcha, the "some people" was referencing the media and not the fans.I was just reiterating what Gaudin said. He said that given GT's environment (I assume our academic hurdles) some people think that 6-7 wins is acceptable. I'm just paraphrasing. It's at the beginning of the interview.
I hope no one is happy with 6-7 wins that's a GT fan. If they are, they better not verbalize it or else a lynch mob will be after them!
Perhaps folks say they aren't happy with 6-7 wins, but I have run across MANY who refuse to make any changes in the academic requirements of the Institute, and concede that if that translates into 6-7 wins, they would rather have that than be an SEC type program they are not proud of.
NB-I am exaggerating both sides of the argument to make the point....some folks have argued their degrees would be devalued if GT relaxed requirements for athletics
Perhaps folks say they aren't happy with 6-7 wins, but I have run across MANY who refuse to make any changes in the academic requirements of the Institute, and concede that if that translates into 6-7 wins, they would rather have that than be an SEC type program they are not proud of.
NB-I am exaggerating both sides of the argument to make the point....some folks have argued their degrees would be devalued if GT relaxed requirements for athletics