3 million in apparel per year is a lot of gear. That's a ton of gear. It's up to CPJ to get his team to win 9 games or more twice. That would be a windfall.
Time to add some cupcakes to the schedule
Tech could have remedied this by restricting the licenses to other vendors and funneling that business to adidas for more cash. The other vendors ... New Era, Top of the World, etc ... make crappy Tech products anyway and we need more consistency in our products.
This is a really good deal for Tech imo. Don't underestimate how the amount of gear that players receive will help in recruiting. I'm not expecting it to help reel in 5 stars left and right, but I seriously think that it will help land some better recruits.
I used to as well, before they changed their myajc layout. Oh well, guess I just won't read the worthless fish wrapper anymore. Not worth my time to have to dial in browser settings to read something that should be free with ads on it.That’s weird - it’s what I do all the time, including today to read the article.
Yea thats a CPJ thing.Is it safe to assume that we will still wear white jerseys for every game?
I hope not. Really want our gold jerseys backIs it safe to assume that we will still wear white jerseys for every game?
no thanks. Our colors are WHITE and gold not GOLD and whiteI hope not. Really want our gold jerseys back
This deal infuriates more that we could’ve jumped on the cash cow by opting out of Russell after yr 7
Looks to be true imo unless Ken messed up the wording. Probably somewhat of a grey area that depends on how well the relationship is at the time, and how well addias is doing financially. 9 wins in a row b2b? Good luck. Only been done 3 times since 2000. What happened to setting realistic, obtainable goals?Regarding the 2 9 win seasons, the exact quote from the article is “The retainer fee will be adjusted by $450,000 if the team wins nine games in a row in back-to-back seasons.”.
If this is accurate, the way I read this, 2 9 win seasons will not invoke the kicker unless the wins are “in a row”. Do you think this is true or poor wording?
You mean its ****ing drad's fault.I don't think leaving Russell earlier would have helped much in the cash deal. Once we were the only P5 school left with them, we lost all leverage with the big three. They knew we were desperate to leave, and didn't exactly need to throw money at us to choose them. We also aren't a big enough name with a big enough fan base to garner the big bucks either. It's our own fault for staying with Russell when the signs were there a decade ago that we needed to leave.
You mean its ****ing drad's fault.
Looks to be true imo unless Ken messed up the wording. Probably somewhat of a grey area that depends on how well the relationship is at the time, and how well addias is doing financially. 9 wins in a row b2b? Good luck. Only been done 3 times since 2000. What happened to setting realistic, obtainable goals?