ACC tourney seeding by winning % correct?Louisville finishes @Virginia Tech and Virginia. They may lose out to finish 8-6. If we go 1-1 we finish 10-7 and finish ahead of that. Duke finished at us and against UNC. They could lose out to, but as long as we go at least 1-1, we finish ahead of them too if they go 1-1. Going 2-0 looks like a requirement to finish in 5th because Clemson will probably win out. But even an okay 1-1 finish looks like a high chance of finishing 6th. Either gives us a good matchup in the ACCT.
Question-
ACC tourney seeding by winning % correct?
Doesn't matter. Beat Duke, beat Wake we're 11-6 in conference and in good shape.I believe so. Which is unfortunate because for example a 9-6 team gets seeded higher than a 10-7 team. We’re getting clobbered in the standings for not playing Boston College twice. If we were currently 11-6 we’d be on cruise control. (And 15-8 overall and getting votes for being ranked.)
I understand what you are saying but that also shortchanges his other improvements offensively from shooting the jumper to his post moves to get baskets. Also Moses does much more than just score the basketball. He is top 5 in the league in points, rebounds, and blocks and top 10 in steals. I know he won't win but he should get some consideration and definitely deserves All ACC recognition.IMO there are two factors that work against Moses, kind of intertwined. One is that for most of the year Jose was seen as the best player on the team. The second is that Moses gets a lot of finishes off lobs or dump offs. Not that should be held against him, but those type of plays are often seen as being more about the guy doing the driving rather than the finishing.
If you look at the other contenders (Hurt, Champaigne, Jones) they've been the clear best players for their teams all year.
Here's what I'm thinking for final standings, based on current schedules:
1) Virginia (15-2)
2) Florida State (12-3)
3) Virginia Tech (11-5)
4) Clemson (11-5)
5) UNC (10-7)
6) Georgia Tech (10-8)
7) Duke (9-9)
8) Notre Dame (9-9)
9) Louisville (8-7)
10) Pittsburgh (8-8)
11) Syracuse (7-11)
12) NC State (6-10)
13) Wake Forest (4-14)
14) Miami (4-15)
15) Boston College (1-14)
If this held true, we'd open against Syracuse the day after the play a game, then if we win we'd play Virginia Tech. Pittsburgh or NC State might also vie for that #11 seed. and Clemson might vie for that #3 seed. Either way, those are winnable games.
Not impossible, but here is the rub:2 weeks later, and this is still a highly likely final order in the top half, absent some missing covid games. Virginia and Florida State will battle it out for #1 and #2. Spots 5 through like 9 still highly in flux.
Funny and not impossible outcome:
Georgia Tech wins out.
UNC loses to either Syracuse or Duke.
Clemson loses to either Syracuse or NC State.
Louisville beats VT but loses to Virginia.
VT loses to Louisville and NC State.
We finish #3. LOL.
How many have played a conference schedule as tough as ours?Half the teams in the ACC have exactly 8 or 9 conference wins.
How many have played a conference schedule as tough as ours?
We likely have the toughest conference SOS.
We've played FSU x 2
UVA x 2
@VT
@UL
Clemson x 2
UNC
@Duke
Cuse at home.
So we've played 6 of the top 7 teams on the road and 11/15 games against teams with winning conference records. It'd be hard to construct a harder schedule without being a team not in the top half of the conference.