I agree on Clemson, not on MiamiThe only games I would thing we lose at this point are Clemson in Death Valley and Miami in Miami.
10-2 would be nice GT would be a shoe-in for the ACCCG.I agree on Clemson, not on Miami
we invaded their territory at least 3 times (not sure if Taquon's fumble was in UT terriory, think it was midfield) and got zero points (2 missed fg's and green's fumble), we used alot of clock, ran up alot of yards, and converted alot of 3rd down to get there because we always had a long field. Our defense didn't really give us a short field to work with that I can remember. We get 3 points out of any of those 3 marches into UT territory and we are all happy today.
Yeah he was an All-American in 2016.It wasn't the GT D that gave us long fields. In the first half the D created a lot of three-and-outs, but the TN punter had some monster punts. One of them was 66 yards.
I can't figure out why it changes for the defense in the 2nd half except that the defense was getting tired. I think Butch Jones told Tennessee to run it down GT's throats and the Jackets we unable to stop the UT running game in the 2nd half.We usually play terrible D in the first half and then adjust at halftime and play better in the second half. It was the complete opposite last night. WTH happened? But even so, IMO, it was the turnovers and the kickoffs that killed us in the end. I sure feel better about this season after game one than I did last year after game one. That was the best opening game offense I think I have ever seen at Tech, and it well may have been the best offense of any game I have seen at Tech. JJ's turnover in particular killed us---a sure 7 points there. But with those kickoffs giving Tenn a short field every time, it was bound to catch up with us sooner or later. Where was King? I thought he was supposed to be the next Butker, and yet he's not even listed with a number on the team roster?
to clarify my point, A short field can be had by getting a turnover, doesn't have be a 3 and out and a poor puntIt wasn't the GT D that gave us long fields. In the first half the D created a lot of three-and-outs, but the TN punter had some monster punts. One of them was 66 yards.
The D had plenty of time to rest what with the long drives we had almost every possession. There is certainly no reason for them to have been tired.I can't figure out why it changes for the defense in the 2nd half except that the defense was getting tired. I think Butch Jones told Tennessee to run it down GT's throats and the Jackets we unable to stop the UT running game in the 2nd half.
Is the injury such that he is out for the season? I sure hope not. We can't survive with the kicking we saw last night.King was injured.
to clarify my point, A short field can be had by getting a turnover, doesn't have be a 3 and out and a poor punt
in the 2nd half, i think UT had a 3 and out on their first possession of the half and maybe one more (?) aftwerwards
After that 70 yard punt, we drove the length of the field and scored a touchdown.
Damn,GT has got a good offense this season! With Marshall and Benson this team s going to be fun to watch
Well done. You know, I could deal with a turnover as the cost of doing business in any offense, but those 14-point jobs as with last night just crush my spirit. I credit Tech and the coaches with keeping their heads in the game after that and getting two OTs out of it, because a Tech score there and that game was close to history.I still think turnover margin is the biggest stat that matters.
+4 W
-1 W
0 W
-3 L
+1 L
-2 L
+2 W
-4 W
-1 W
-1 L
+3 W
-1 L
-1 L0 W
0 W
+1 W
+2 W
+2 W
-3 L
0 L
+5 W
+1 W
+1 W
+1 W
+1 W
-1 L
+1 W+2 W
+1 W
+1 L
+1 L
-2 L
+2 L
-2 L
-1 W
-1 L
-1 L
-4 L
-3 L+2 W
-2 W
0 W
0 L
-3 L
+1 L
0 W
+1 W
-2 L
+3 W
+3 W
0 W
+1 W-2 or worse = 2-10-2 L
-1 = 3-6
0 = 6-2
+1 = 9-4
+2 or better = 10-1
We have won 5 games total when we have lost the turnover battle since Ted Roof has been our DC. So 23.8% is my percentage.
What happened with King will he be able to play next game?King was injured.