- Messages
- 10,063
- Location
- Williamsburg Virginia
Think that earned run streak will end after and inning or two this Friday.
Two innings it was, good call.
Think that earned run streak will end after and inning or two this Friday.
Heading into final weekend of non-conference baseball. Three ACC teams are unbeaten: NC State, FSU, and Va Tech (what??!!?). Ok... I had to look. VT is 7-0 having played what appear to be quite weak teams (based on name recognition only)... but credit to them for not losing; and giving up low run totals. [I did not delve into their numbers anymore than that] I'd say nothing else is much of a surprise.. so far. One loss teams: Duke, UNC, Clemson.
Not really any "marquee" type matchups this weekend. Minnesota at NC State may be the best 2-team series going.
Good catch without calling me out. USCe at Clemson is obviously the biggest ACC-involved series. The Minn at NC State is a distant 2nd. Yep.. agree Clemson winning is ultimately better for Tech when we beat them multiple times. ...never UGA!Gotta root for @Clemson (7-1) over USCe (7-1) this weekend I guess. On one hand, I don't want Clemson to be good this year (or any year). On the other, I want them to be worth more when we beat them.
Neither team has played a good team yet. So it'll be a good chance to see how good the new Clemson pitchers really are. @ Clemson and they have won the last 4 series 2-1. So "expect" Clemson to win the series.
Both teams are struggling batting. Which is really surprising to me given the teams they have played. CU .262 and USCe .275.
Not ACC but I'm a big Ga Southern fan this weekend. Hope they sweep UGAg. No conflict there. Still laughing about UGAg's 1-0 loss to LIU Brooklyn. Nice of UGAg to let LIU go 1-6. Statistically, I'd say that was improbable.
107 days to the CWS. A lot of baseball to be played.
Gotta root for @Clemson (7-1) over USCe (7-1) this weekend I guess. On one hand, I don't want Clemson to be good this year (or any year). On the other, I want them to be worth more when we beat them.
Neither team has played a good team yet. So it'll be a good chance to see how good the new Clemson pitchers really are. @ Clemson and they have won the last 4 series 2-1. So "expect" Clemson to win the series.........
The fact we don't play FSU or NC State gives us a leg up.... or should.Clemson getting pounded 11-1 in rubber match game T5th. They gave up 5 runs on Friday and Saturday. So their pitching hasn't been proven out yet.
ACC is going to be a dog fight this year in the middle where I "expect" us to be. Right now there are 9 teams in the ACC who have lost fewer than our 4 lost games.
If we could be **consistent** on offense, 3rd base play and relief pitching, we'd be great. Till then, "expect" us to be fighting for a NCAA berth to get eliminated in the first round at an elite team's home field. "Hope" we get home field.
11 games down and 43 to go. Nothing for us to do but wait and see.
Also getting our "major" series at home (UNC, Clemson, UVA) should help.The fact we don't play FSU or NC State gives us a leg up.... or should.
Also getting our "major" series at home (UNC, Clemson, UVA) should help.
It'll help.
But look at this Warren Nolan projection for us in the ACC. 9-21. http://warrennolan.com/baseball/2019/team-predict-schedule?team=Georgia-Tech
It still is too early in the season to have any confidence in any predictions. But we have to improve a lot to catch up to where other teams are already. All teams have their strengths and weaknesses (well almost all except the likes of Vandy, UNC, UCLA .....). Looking at our mostly home schedule to date and record, I can see where an algorithm would come up with this based only on performance and not potential. 9 ACCs teams have a better win % than we do.
That guy is a freaking idiot. I could see picking us to be in the middle somewhere, but you can’t end up at 9-21 unless you’re trying to fit other teams you care about and have to adjust records like ours to make your predictions work.
I'm pretty sure all his calculations of rankings & predictions are based on results (w factors for home/away & maybe even margin of victory). Nothing involving roster makeup or anything. NW gets a bump for beat Duke (& Tech to an extent) on the road.In the last 40 years, we've never been even close to something like 9-21. You'll find a couple years of 12-18 and 13-16, but those our outliers and still a big difference from 9-21. I'm not here saying we're going to be world beaters, but you have to have some sort of logic to come up with the single worst record in program history. Are we devoid of talent (no). Did we lose a bunch of starters (no). Do we have an unusually tough schedule (no).
Some (relatively useless) tidbits from 2018 conference action (70 total ACC series):
- There were 0 road series wins in Week#1 of ACC play. Week1 was only weekend where no team won a road series.
- Full ACC schedule there were 26 road series wins...or 37% of the time the road team won a series. (14 of those occurred in 3 week period in April...middle of ACC schedule)
- There were 10 road sweeps (9 of those occurred in 2nd half of ACC schedule). The victims: CLEM, PITTx2,VTx2, UVA, BCx2, NCST, WF
At first, I thought the trends here were strange...why so many more road wins in middle to end of ACC schedule. Here is my theory. Early in schedule you have fewer road winners because the "northern" teams are on road.. those teams are typically weaker (ND, BC, Pitt)... eventually, the middle/end of schedule those teams are at home more (losing there too). No different this year. BC, ND, VT are on road Week 1 and Week 2. Pitt for Week 1.
Some (relatively useless) tidbits from 2018 conference action (70 total ACC series):
- There were 0 road series wins in Week#1 of ACC play. Week1 was only weekend where no team won a road series.
- Full ACC schedule there were 26 road series wins...or 37% of the time the road team won a series. (14 of those occurred in 3 week period in April...middle of ACC schedule)
- There were 10 road sweeps (9 of those occurred in 2nd half of ACC schedule). The victims: CLEM, PITTx2,VTx2, UVA, BCx2, NCST, WF
At first, I thought the trends here were strange...why so many more road wins in middle to end of ACC schedule. Here is my theory. Early in schedule you have fewer road winners because the "northern" teams are on road.. those teams are typically weaker (ND, BC, Pitt)... eventually, the middle/end of schedule those teams are at home more (losing there too). No different this year. BC, ND, VT are on road Week 1 and Week 2. Pitt for Week 1.