- Messages
- 4,915
Nothing more than feelings.Feelings.
Nothing more than feelings.Feelings.
We certainly have trouble holding leads and that's GT's problem. Stoudamire has to figure out how to stall runs with personnel changes or offense/defense changes.Unacceptable to lose THAT game at Home with a 16 point lead against Boston College.
Starts at the top and CDS earned a very bad grade for this result. I think he’s taking program in right direction, and if stay the course this program will be relevant again. But today, with a 16 point lead, and no real foul trouble - Coach earned a D- today. With the control of game, the outcome is comparable to UMass Lowell. Simply disappointing today.
That was a walk no doubt about it
I have never heard of a rule that eliminates a prior call for a later call. I could see both being called as the hook and hole being after the play. But I can’t see how the hook and hold would eliminate the foul that was called beforehand.
We really never were going to be an NCAAT Team. We have some nice players but we really lack the special player who can will a team to a win. Some of the young guys may get there if they stay around long enough.That is probably the end of our NCAA Tournament dreams. Just way too lethargic coming out of halftime.
Officials are only held accountable when they lose post season assignments. I should never know the names of refs, but I do because over time I know they suck. Teddy V, Lenny Wirtz are just at the top of the list. This was not a well officiated game.Terrible idea. It was a clear hook & hold. And I thought the non traveling call that led to the tech was also debatable and, in fact, I was leaning towards the official being right. The officials were actually right significantly more than wrong in this game. The close calls are being exaggerated cause of the frustrations that GT let Bc have the lead at that point.
What does holding officials accountable to you mean? You’ll be surprised that officials are held accountable in many ways. This is not a game to “punish” the refs. They called a good game. I’m sure their bosses will provide info on what they can do better.
Yeah, even with the hook and hold, I thought we should have gotten 2 FTs, then they shoot their free throws and get the ball.Can anyone explain this? I've literally never seen that happen. It logically makes no sense.
Were they loud during our free throws?Crowd was good, not sold out but VERY loud at times.
Can anyone explain this? I've literally never seen that happen. It logically makes no sense.
... Trying to forget my feelings...Nothing more than feelings.
I would agree if the decision was the foul was the result of the hook and hold but I thought it was pretty obvious it was foul and then hook and hold. Did you see it differently?In general, if a foul that is assessed to a player is deemed on review to be a result of a flagrant foul committed on them then the foul can be taken off. My guess is the initial foul was the defender having his arm up high around Kelly's neck, and then on replay the ref deemed that action was a result of the flagrant hook and hold they called Kelly for.
We really never were going to be an NCAAT Team. We have some nice players but we really lack the special player who can will a team to a win. Some of the young guys may get there if they stay around long enough.
You have to look at how bad we were the past 2 years, what we returned and what we brought in. Reeves has been very good. Ndongo has been great at times, ok at others and a freshmen at others. Really high upside though. George is solid for a freshmen PG but the ACC has a lot of experienced very good PGs. Kyle is a nice player but not a starting caliber ACC PG.
Debo is a nice off the bench player. Kelly has talent. He is struggling this year.
Not having a full strength Terry really hurt.
The rest, are just guys.
Lol. No. Tbh the only one who really struggled from the line was Baye. And he’s a center so it makes sense.Were they loud during our free throws?
Sadly, there's a high probability you are correct.That is probably the end of our NCAA Tournament dreams. Just way too lethargic coming out of halftime.
In general, if a foul that is assessed to a player is deemed on review to be a result of a flagrant foul committed on them then the foul can be taken off. My guess is the initial foul was the defender having his arm up high around Kelly's neck, and then on replay the ref deemed that action was a result of the flagrant hook and hold they called Kelly for.
This ^^^In general, if a foul that is assessed to a player is deemed on review to be a result of a flagrant foul committed on them then the foul can be taken off. My guess is the initial foul was the defender having his arm up high around Kelly's neck, and then on replay the ref deemed that action was a result of the flagrant hook and hold they called Kelly for.
The foul was a result of the hook and hold?This ^^^