Search results

Nm

Thank you. Exactly

How do you feel about the theory of gravity?

For the record, I never called it a statistic. It's just the 4 years prior to this season. That timeline for recruits is the op's suggested required time for classes to become effective. That would reflect on this year's football season. It's actually quite simple, not sure how that other guy...

😆😆😆😆😆

As I said, I tried to help you lol. Don't think it will help though.

I tried to help you lol.

It's important, if you're in the top 15. That's the whole point. Hope that helps

You don't consider 08 and 09 good years? Especially for GT. lol you're just upset because you realized what your original post sounds like when you look at it rationally.

To summarize: If you keep 2 of the worst year's record for a coach, BUT take away 2 of his best, suddenly he doesn't look so good as a coach. Wow what an amazing point you made there. You would make a fabulous statistionist.

I've tried to play nice with you for a while, but since you insist. Looking at 2018 rankings followed by 2021 win-loss record. These are from 247. I did 2018 since it's the magic number you claim takes a program's recruits to be considered ready for competition. If you look at the list...

Nahh

A perfect example of wasting resources, and partially/indirectly responsible for the continuation of this thread.

Is there though?

Parker was a stud. Don't worry about that guy, his views are questionable at best.

Outside of top15, it's a crap shoot

Two things: 1. Given how the season went, CGC was lucky to have KSU with third string QB with little experience early in the season. 2. You basically admitted to being a troll, see below:

Seems like he should be pushing 30 lol.

Funny

There lots of truth to this here. It's like anything else in life, too much/too little of one thing is often not good balance is always the challenging part.