Search results

CGC has a slim chance with the new OC and QB coach. If that plays out like it needs to, as in key/long hold down the offensive side freeing him up to become heavily involved defensively, then there's a chance for a decent season. Either way he needs 8 wins or a very convincing 7, else he gone.

Same here!

Selfishly for Tech, I would be all for this bill if the original NIL was taken away. It would level the playing field very quickly. Hey 4 star, you want to go gray shirt at Alabama/any other sec school for a year or two, or make the same amount with paying time here at Tech?

If hating the dumpster fire CGC has created is what you mean, then by all means label me lol. Don't understand what there is to "see through" there lol. Sorry I don't settle for mediocrity (below mediocrity actually) like you.

8 wins or he's gone.

I would go to any game in Oregon. Just got back from there, my God what a beautiful state. Can it cost to cost conference C2C (like B1G, but 2C ---> 20)

I mean you're not making it sound much better. You're now basically saying it can't possibly be worse, because they were that bad.

I wish he would have just gotten in there from day one. Obviously the guy knows defense. I was much more excited about that than all the recruiting Ra Ra. Maybe this is the year? (Hopefully a nice bump with the new offensive coaches as well? Lighting in a bottle?)

Wasn't so hard not that long ago.

I remember when the ACC took in fsu, Miami, vt... And everyone thought it was the end of the world. It's never as good or as bad as you think it is.

These aren't conferences anymore. You're not going to see many teams in your "conference" for many years.

The product has been there in flashes, brief flashes, but it's was nice when it was there last year. Especially the UNC game. There's always hope.

Agree, it's not terrible. When you factor in context and what was sold when CGC inherited the program, it's laughable. He claimed elite performance and winning titles. Now did I expect him to be in title contention in year 4? Not necessarily. But the way he was raa raaing and all the lavish...

Pretend we are talking about Virginia Tech for a second. Now you just watch them get 3 wins in the first season under a new coach. Second year, same result. Third year, another 3 wins. Fourth year they get 5 maybe 6 wins. You speak with some of their fans regarding what they should do about...

No, we hate him because he pees sitting down.

Seriously still don't understand how people keep saying 5-6 wins is enough to keep CGC after two 3 win seasons. If we do keep CGC after 5-6 wins, it's basically GT throwing in the towel.

Keep in mind, as I said, it was purely speculation by me.

Not sure how much it was pushed into him. This is purely speculation, but TStan has repeatedly mentioned how important marketing of the program is, and the foundation of his method at Oregon State and UCF. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that that's what really made CGC an attractive...

Same tired old excuse. Lol. As others eluded to, the guy now at UVA said he was interested, but not contacted.

Yes I'm sure.