Search results

I don't know how it will all shake out but in my head at least it would probably go down more like influencer marketing where companies would pay for sponsored posts or simply receive free product and then post about. I could see that being more small business heavy but I've got to imagine...

They don't need to "cough up a ton of money". A little bit of money can be a lot of money to a college kid.

Do you think this doesn't already happen?

That's the way things are going and it's definitely better to be ahead of the game than trying to play catch up

Oh for sure. And it was Sims' 3rd game in college and he had 4 INTs which seems pretty flukey and not likely to be repeated. Still hurts though

Makes it that much more painful that we lost to them and made their offense look anything but terrible

"Buy winners. Sell losers." Damn Liberty, don't give away ALL the tricks of the trade :D

There is no way you can say there is "NO risk" of long term effects unless you're deliberately being dishonest. While it isn't many overall there are younger people who have died from COVID. Jayson Tatum is a healthy NBA player who uses an inhaler before games now due to his bout with COVID...

No doubt a ton of differences between the countries. Average net worth is one comparison to make. Median net worth is another and Finland's is a bit higher than the US. Lots of stuff to look at

Looked it up just for my own info A church tax is...interesting

Probably should have said, "an increased amount of volcanic activity". I'm not suggesting volcanic activity stopped simply that the current trend of CO2 levels seems much more strongly correlated with human emissions than an increase in volcanic activity over time. If someone has info backing...

I understand there have been changes in the climate in the past but I haven't seen any indication that we are undergoing one currently that is not due to, or at least largely correlated, with mankind's emissions. You seem to be speaking with a certainty that you criticize when the opposite side...

If the CO2 levels are currently rising without the aid from mankind then what do you attribute it to? From what I've read they've been able to explain pervious warmings with volcanic eruptions or positron to the sun but those don't apply currently.

I think you're looking for the CO2 ppm measurements to be much more efficient in reflecting changes in emissions than reality, it's not going to be a 1 to 1 change. Like bobongo mentioned there are other systems that contribute and carbon sinks become less efficient at absorbing CO2 as they...

What's utterly ridiculous is that you'd expect a drop in temperatures based off of one year having a 6.5% reduction in emissions. Though you seem to be abandoning that point and if so, that's fine. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with the graphs you're sharing from NOAA, it looks...