Search results

"You have coaches saying they haven't seen a Tech coach in 11 years," Suddes said. "They were recruiting different guys, but you have kids coming on campus who say they haven't been here before. It's been like they forgot Georgia Tech was in Atlanta." Wow.

Outside of Michigan, Army once again plays one of the softest schedules in college football. I'm sure the D rankings will reflect that.

It helps when Colgate, Eastern MI, Air Force, Lafayette, Navy, Houston, San Jose St, Hawaii, and Miami,OH are on the schedule, all of whom suck.

Well, I know where he doesn't want to go - to class!

I did watch that game and you're right - our best O was mostly stuffed that game. Defense bailed us out, thanks to a crappy backup Clemson QB.

Can we catch up to Clemson and be perennial top-10? No. Their curriculum and lower academic standards gives them more flexibility in recruiting than does ours. Can we be perennial top-35, ala Stanford? Yes. (I know Stanford has a few basket-weaving scholarships but on the whole, the...

what is this "newspaper" that you speak of?

Reading scheme fans actually try to explain the logic of a half-qtr death march when we were down 21 pts was mind-boggling at TOS. The kool aid was sweeter for some, I guess.

LOL - OK. "pretty colors and elitist terms" wasn't a personal insult of you - it's how your description of our offense reads. Sorry but it wasn't as fancy as you tried to make it. And then things like "This is an old D strategy with the spread option: make the QB run and try to run down his...

It's likely the same fans he accused of expecting multiple nattys in a few years. Crickets still chirping on a request for who they are.

"meme more effective in opposing the spread option"? LOL - what in God's name are you talking about? What meme am I missing? I don't care what pretty colors and elitist terms you'd like to associate to it but when the QB has 30+ runs/game, please stop trying to sell this as any sort of...

because our coach is not named Paul Johnson anymore.

and your chicks for free.

There's never been a GT team that threw and ran the ball as effectively as Fridge's did. Hell, it made George "Oh My" Godsey look like a rock star at times.

What it comes down to is: Everything PJ did - good. Same things done by other coaches - bad. The fanboy hypocrisy is kinda cute.

I totally understood how the offense worked. Unfortunately, so did half our schedule almost every year...and more than that a few times. After the first couple of seasons, it provided no advantage whatsoever. It's that attitude - that PJ's offense was smarter and better than everyone else...

I see this all the time and it's applicable to every single offensive or defensive scheme in football. All teams will usually do a lot better when they have talent that is both good and experienced on either side of the ball. A solid scheme minimizes the impact of a lack of either. The fact...

lol - logic says that if it would've been an advantage, we should've won. Since it made Duke, et al focus even more on defeating us...with success...that's a pretty lousy definition of the word "advantage". PS: Duke and Pitt didn't have an "obvious talent advantage" nor did Minnesota.

Well-deserved - congrats!

LOL - none of those teams appeared to be very confused on the field against us.