Search results

Remember how loose and sloppy his play (technique) was when he got here? The amount of growth he has shown over the years is just astounding. He has become a totally different player.

Once again you leave me confused. "dissembling"? What are you trying to say? Perhaps my vocab isn't up to snuff. Maybe I need to clarify. We have a competitive football team. That is my position or "case" as you say. It is impossible to say we are a good team because we are not finding ways to...

Sad part is, ten days isn't going to get our guys healed up. Most of our dings are long term.

It is so unfortunate, all of it. Look, this is war. You have to go to war with the unit you have, not the one you wish you had. End of story. I feel sorry for our injured. I really do, BUT, I fully support the guys who are left and I expect them to raise their collective games.

Well, this has been the worst year by far under CPJ's leadership, and yet, we have been competitive in all but one of our games. That means something. It would be a different story if we were getting handled every game. We are not. We are merely failing to find a way to win. We were dominant...

Argument for what case?

Keep Roof. Find some DLs.

We need screens that go wide early. Either the spy on JT will go with the BB or he will stay on JT. Either way it is good. Most teams are sending 6 with a spy. If they are sending 6, they can't do both. Heck, the BB hasn't been helping much in protection anyway. In a similar fashion, did you see...

It is funny how elusive team chemistry really is. You only have to change a couple atoms to have a completely different molecule (and substance) all together.

We have a bad record, granted. I am not sure we are a bad team. I have seen those. They are typically not competitive. We have 6 losses, 4 of which legitimately could have gone the other way, and 5 of which came against teams with superb W-L records. Look, there is no way to argue we are a good...

Bottom line, we are not very fast at WR and AB and teams do not fear getting hit with the big play consistently enough to warrant backing off. We are not stretching the field and beating one on one coverage is not a given. If we were ringing up points over the top, you wouldn't see some of these...

So you are saying that if Clemson had a guy who elevated himself beyond Watson, that he wouldn't be playing? Really? I'll speak for myself. I NEVER, as a coach, guaranteed any player a starting job EVER. He had to earn it every year, just like everybody else. What do you think is going on out...

This might be the best stat ever for analyzing CFB strength.

I am confused. Pretty much every team this is true. What point are you trying to make?

I'll go on record as saying the QB competition should be open. Not just for 2016, but for every year. Not just for QB either, but EVERY position EVERY year. As a matter of fact, it should be open right now if someone can take it. I am not a big believer in incumbents, but rather, what is best...

I am unaware that we have changed our blocking scheme from last year. Where did that idea come from? We are doing the same things, in terms of scheme, even if not as effective. We scooped on the back side last year, just like we are now. We chip on our way to the second level, just like we do...

I don't think our line is THAT young. LT (sr) LG (sr) C (jr) RG (sr) LT (fr). These numbers reflect who started in Charlottesville.

First of all, let me say I am proud of all of you for how you have handled this thread. It is obviously a hot topic and has the potential for a lot of name calling and personal attacks. That hasn't happened. When we characterize other's opinions, it is different than attacking the person. Thanks...

It was a tough game to watch. That is for sure. Once again, close but no cigar. This one just seemed like so many others at Hooville, inexplicable. There have been a lot of eggs laid in that stadium by GT over the last 20 years.

I am completely sold on CC....AS AN ATHLETE. He still needs to prove himself at QB for GT.