Search results

If not late in the 2021 season, then improved recruiting may be at risk.

Losing to Duke would not be a good sign of "progress". They are worse than bad. Gibbs maybe 150+?

A lot of what frustrates people is squarely on both LOS. At least on the DL we have a youth issue, but on the OL, Williams is the only youngster starter. This could take longer than I and others believe it should. If the many young OL (and DL for that matter), players on the roster don't produce...

Very good picks Colorado! Gotta remember Billy Lothridge, Ted Roof, and Mackel Harris though.

The coaches have Sunday thru Friday to work on penalties and turnovers. It's what they are paid very well to do.

bwelbo, seems to me you are putting words into my post that don't exist. #5-7 in the ACC is not elite imo---pretty clear, huh? CGC has demonstrated that he is a good recruiter by virtue of last year's class---clear enuf? Without consistent recruiting in the high 3s with several 4s, there's no...

My guess is, the transfer portal will play an important role in Clemson's QB picture.

Who said he or brd members here said that? He has said repeatedly we would recruit at an elite level, ok? At a bare minimum in most people's minds imo, that means classes with high 3s and numerous (5-7) 4s. This has to happen consistently or he has over promised. It hasn't happened yet, but time...

#5-6-7 in the ACC is not "elite" per CGC's promises. He's definitely a good recruiter, but overpromising comes back to haunt when losing. Of course when winning, nothing matters. Over the next 18-19 games there has to be to any eye an obvious improvement trend. Otherwise, the Big $ guys ain't...

Yep, so does jacketup. Why would he? He owns them lately and good luck on out bidding Clem.

Maybe......."In fact, you could argue that EVEN IF A 5* does enroll at Tech ... he will have a harder time being drafted in the first round than if he went to another school. And that decision is worth ... MILLIONS"

And narry a 5* or the equivalent at the time on the field! A number of "4*" for sure though.

Look, only focusing on 5* players who represent a very small percentage of recruits(.01%) is not only myopic, it's a good case for how ridiculous your Geoff comments vs Saban and Dabo really are. We don't sign 5* except rarely. Only a handful of programs sign the majority of them. We have to...

Like what, maybe the relatively high % of all 5* on all teams that get drafted, our grad rate vs ugag's, what the bumber stickers say on the campus pick-up trucks, what the recent star graduates are saying about campus life at ugag, what a Tech degree is worth, or .....? Have at it.

My post is stubborn as well.

Cute Ves, but badly flawed. Hint: Your Geoff quote is completely absurd considering he's gonna recruit on an elite level---ask him if u haven't heard. Plus he can say all of our graduates are set for life. Plus, based CPJs record, he can claim you will actually graduate, and btw you should check...

Clemson lost a ton from last years team on both LOS. It's all about elite recruiting (that CGC has mentioned we will do a hundred times). He 's a proven recruiter, albeit mostly at places with a very large bank roll and majors to hide guys that read at a 3rd grade level (not a joke). Yes, he...

Your first line is the best of the 4.

I ain't talking bout the ill fated fg decision. Taking a program like Bama to the woodshed a couple of times would be plenty clownish enuf for me.

Clemson-45 YJs-14 Dabo not likely to run it up. Let's escape without injuries to catch ND looking ahead to Clem later (much sweeter win).