Search results

Clemson's remaining schedule is a cake walk. We could really benefit from UL and/or Dook ****ting the bed down the stretch and falling behind us in the standings. Don't want to end up behind or tied with Dook UL UNC because all 3 of them will likely get the blue blood treatment if they are on...

one more time today...

I've never tried to use it until 5-10 mins before tipoff. perhaps the legit links show up closer to gametime? idk. also, i've never tried it on a phone.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ncaaBBallStreams/

but it also helps UNC in conf standings, and they appear to be our top competition for the 6th spot. idk what's more important: final conference standings, or the bump in NET rating points from teams we beat (UNC) rising in the rankings and potentially passing us???

feel like we need to get BC or NCST game rescheduled. go thru the remaining ACC schedules for GT and UNC and even 1 single extra ACC win could be the difference in final conference rankings. and in a screwy year like this, seems like committee could use that metric (conference record) as a...

that was kinda my point. and then the question becomes "how important are those 2 wins" in the eyes of the committee.

if UNC ends up a bubble team, how important are the 2 freebie wins (northeastern and marquette) they added on short notice in feb?

The OP graphic from the "Shot Quality" site ranks us 1st in the ACC in offensive shot quality and 14th in the nation for overall shot quality (off & def). It includes all games this season. And to your point above, I believe I read that it factors in individual shooting skills/stats in its...

thanks for posting all these. looks like a good twitter follow. i scrolled through the feed and found 4 of the 5 games charted for GT this year: Duke, Clemson (first matchup), Nebraska, Kentucky.

I agree regarding the metric being under a coach's control. And that is one of the reasons I found the original post graphic so interesting and shared it. I interpreted it as an indicator that Pastner has done well in terms of 1) designing offensive systems/strategies, and 2) teaching individual...

Agree. I think the key here might be limited data. It mentions that the size of the logo correlates to the sample size of games they have charted so far. The GT logo is fairly small compared to many others. This newer graphic also contradicts the original post graphic (which indicates that GT...

this is a good read, thanks for sharing. it's methodical and detailed. GT fans hyper-analyzing Pastner should read it.

regarding leads... what i cant figure out is if it is us, or if it is the quality of the competition. are we failing to extend leads into double-digits because of our own issues/mistakes, or are we going on runs to take leads, and then quality/tough opponents go on their run to claw back. idk...

was about to hit "like" or "love" but that doesnt seem strong enough. this post hits the nail directly on the ****ing head. with emphasis on this part: The "issue" is there are a ton of guys both in college and stocked in the G League who have similar skills/athleticism. only thing i would add...