Search results

Yep, also super interested in this.

This, btw, is what I was talking about with structural issues w/r/t footbal. I'm not saying I disagree with Vespidae, btw. It's a TOTALLY reasonable viewpoint to have, that the football program should enhance the university, and not vice versa. THAT BEING SAID, other schools and alumni bases...

I mean, I'd like the whole defense to be 375 lbs and run 4.4 40's, but if I'm choosing speed OR size, give me speed.

So, I will preface that when I heard that you guys were looking at Woody, I was tickled pink. (I'm relatively sure that there is evidence of this on this board, and it would be tough for me to deny it at this point). My thoughts were that I would take giving up more big plays if it meant...

Again, to me, this is ENTIRELY fair. Coach Johnson has not demonstrated that he can oversee a program that can field even an average defense anytime recently. I personally think the offensive excellence has largely overcome the awful defense, but the defense has, in fact, been awful. As the...

https://lastwordoncollegefootball.com/2018/10/17/the-growing-problem-of-college-football-attendance/ Same reasons they are everywhere else

You're asking a different question than I'm answering. He indicated that the offense is about as effective as other offenses in the ACC. I showed him that it was, in fact, not. Offense is roughly 40% of football. That still leaves 60% as a separate conversation. We can talk about CPJ's...

Really? Because you were 3nd in the ACC in scoring PPG https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/points-per-game and 11th in the country (and 2nd in the ACC) in offensive efficiency https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/feioff I feel like your definition of "everyone else" is...

I'm sure this is a waste of keystrokes, but here goes: Look at your average recruiting rankings. Look at your average offensive metrics. If the system provides no advantage, they should be exactly the same. Are they the same? (I'll give you a hint, they're not). So, if it's not the system...

FWIW, Auburn's offense was worse than GT's this year, with better players. Don't know why you'd want to downgrade, but the heart wants what it wants.

Here's the truth of the matter: With or without Paul Johnson, you are not going to be playing for any championships in the near future, unless you make MASSIVE changes to both your academic requirements and your infrastructure. You have issues at GT. I acknowledge this. They prevent you from...

Dude, people aren't interested in facts

Meh, you COULD win. Like, GT could play out of their minds, and UGA could turn it over and stuff happens. But UGA SHOULD win, and for GT fans to EXPECT to win is what is foolhardy, IMO.

Yeah, I don't think you are. I think you're trending slightly up from last year, and further I would expect to see a relatively big jump on defense next year now that the guys will have a full year/offseason in the system.

Well, I mean that's a reasonable argument. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I can see where you're coming from.

so, my take on your question is that it's a little off. Coach Woody came to work for a guy who had ALREADY DEMONSTRATED he could cope with all the negatives. He just had to improve on Roof's peformance.

Don't forget, none of the kids in-state grew up rooting for you, and the school has a reputation for not being very fun to attend. COME ON DOWN, coach!

Sorry if I have broken these rules. I'm still a little surly from last night. I apologize if I've been out of line

Yes, I posted the link above. Coach Johnson is one the lower paid coaches in the P5.

Right back at you. I'd trade Mendenhall for Johnson in a heartbeat.