It's been an interesting discussion and I hate to open a can of worms, but given this comment, how comfortable are you with this approach to our current situation?
90%.
Gonna be hard to win many games with 8.5 players
The only thing with CPJ is I don't think he had the money available, so he sucked it up and did what he could. Also wonder if some were forced on him. But I will agree he was a stubborn old coot.100%.
Look, this was my complaint about CPJ as well. If you are going to be TO, you should commit to be the absolute best in the world at it. And we didn't. He should have replaced a number of staff (IMO) to get there. But he ultimately "satisfied" himself that they were ok.
I learned this lesson over and over. Define the operating model (in our case, the offense or game approach) and get damn good at it.
It's not the players. I rarely replaced employees. Who's going to do the work? Managers must manage. To a plan. It's not complicated.
The only thing with CPJ is I don't think he had the money available, so he sucked it up and did what he could. Also wonder if some were forced on him. But I will agree he was a stubborn old coot.
This is where I misunderstood you and where I think your business analogy breaks down. You can't manage a couple 10ths of a second off a guy's 40 time or make an O-lineman's arms 2 inches longer. You can make players bigger and stronger to a point, but better athletes win.
Seriously? Do you think the better athletes won last Saturday?
One game. Exceptions dont disprove a rule.
Like I said, you can catch a team napping once in a blue moon. On the whole, we 100 percent need better athletes to compete at a higher level.
Yes, let's get rid of the one thing that is attracting recruits to our program currently, the culture and fun. Then we can both lose and be boring doing it!
Teams that are already winning can afford the business-like approach. We can't.
One game. Exceptions dont disprove a rule.
Like I said, you can catch a team napping once in a blue moon. On the whole, we 100 percent need better athletes to compete at a higher level.
Tech never led...the entire game...against FCS team that was 0-2. That isn’t being caught napping. That’s getting whipped by an inferior team.
Tell me again about not being able to beat Duke.
Here's my question ... If we played a Tobias Oliver the entire game with no switching ... would we have won?
I think so.
He probably had a hearty meal at the Waffle House following the gameI think so too. So ... we CHOSE to put the players in a position to LOSE. Not the players ...bad coaching lost us the game. IMO.
I would think we would they couldn't seem to stop him.Here's my question ... If we played a Tobias Oliver the entire game with no switching ... would we have won?
Georgia Tech before Saturday hadn't lost to a team of that level since Bobby Dodd's 4-6 1950 team lost 14-13 to VMII would think we would they couldn't seem to stop him.
After watching the Falcon 1 st half are we trying to run their offense or are they running our offense ?
Here's my question ... If we played a Tobias Oliver the entire game with no switching ... would we have won?
I disagree. Lombardi didn’t have the best talent as much as the best trained talent.
I’d rather have a 3 star with common sense, anticipation and someone I can train than a 5 star who can’t spell cat,