BainbridgeJacket
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,210
We are actually getting better every game on the OL. We're still not very good and I think the body types will look much different a few years down the road.
We are actually getting better every game on the OL. We're still not very good and I think the body types will look much different a few years down the road.
Yeah, I've done the same math and come to the same conclusion. If the limiting factor of our team is truly the men in the trenches (at least for the system we are presently running), then we aren't going to be competitive until 2021 at the earliest. Maybe we should all hibernate until then.Speaking of down the road...next year it looks like we lose Morgan and Southers to graduation, and we could lose Cooper and Lee unless they redshirt and come back for one more year. Is that right? Especially if we lose Cooper and/or Lee, we're going to have to hope we get some fresh recruits to break ATL next year. Hate to say it but our situation doesn't improve much on the OL until 2021 at the earliest, unless we get some very unexpected transfer help.
You’re right, it does go deeper than size. But to say Key has size to work with now is crazy. Size relative to the average human? Absolutely. Size relative to the average Power 5 lineman? No shot. Just take a look at any other team’s roster and take note on how many OL the have listed at 6’4” 310+, and then look at what Tech has listed. I’m not talking about Clemson, UGA, Ohio State, etc. when I say look at other teams. I’m talking about Duke, UNC, UVA, Pitt, etc. Tech’s line is much closer to that of Temple or Army than it is to even UNC.
Speaking of down the road...next year it looks like we lose Morgan and Southers to graduation, and we could lose Cooper and Lee unless they redshirt and come back for one more year. Is that right? Especially if we lose Cooper and/or Lee, we're going to have to hope we get some fresh recruits to break ATL next year. Hate to say it but our situation doesn't improve much on the OL until 2021 at the earliest, unless we get some very unexpected transfer help.
Besides the 30 lb difference? And height, and wingspans? Idk i cant find one eitherFrom the program at the Tech - Carolina game, here are the numbers for linemen.
Georgia Tech
Offensive Guard
C Hanson 6-2 314
J DeFoor 6-5 305
Offensive Tackle
J Southers 6-5 310
Z Quinney 6-6 295
Carolina
Offensive Guard
E Montilis 6-3 315
M McKethan 6-7 332
Offensive Tackle
J Tucker 6-7 335
J Ezeudu 6-4 325
I'm not seeing such a glaring difference. What am I missing?
Besides the 30 lb difference? And height, and wingspans? Idk i cant find one either
From the program at the Tech - Carolina game, here are the numbers for linemen.
Georgia Tech
Offensive Guard
C Hanson 6-2 314
J DeFoor 6-5 305
Offensive Tackle
J Southers 6-5 310
Z Quinney 6-6 295
Carolina
Offensive Guard
E Montilis 6-3 315
M McKethan 6-7 332
Offensive Tackle
J Tucker 6-7 335
J Ezeudu 6-4 325
I'm not seeing such a glaring difference. What am I missing?
And wingspan. Two 6'7" OTs with reach vs smaller guys without.The UNC line is bigger but size doesn't tell the whole story. As I recall, Elon had a mammoth offensive line last year. It's also about mobility, ability, and strength.
If you total the weights for all, there is an 83 lb difference.
Folks on this board are talking like there is a huge discrepancy. Heights are relatively the same and I have no measurement of wingspan. So no, I do not see a big difference. Yes, overall a small advantage Carolina, but to make it sound like Carolina dwarfs Techs line is deceiving.
Skill level is altogether another matter.
21 pounds and 2 inches is a big difference. Go find someone 2 inches taller and 21 pounds heavier than you. See how pushes the other a half-step backwards first.