- Messages
- 8,093
- Location
- Augusta, Georgia
I have little confidence in his stories about things like this, especially since he was the only one that I saw reporting it.
So you think he's wrong?
I have little confidence in his stories about things like this, especially since he was the only one that I saw reporting it.
So you think he's wrong?
That is obvious since he now published a story indicating that the school now said there were three positives during the two weeks that the original story said had none.
I have nothing against Ken. My comments might read as though I do, but I don't intend to sound that way. I am a stickler for details. If the "spokesman" was either named or in a named position, it would have added credibility to the story. If the story included more details, such as: There were no positive test results received between August 10th and August 24th, which included tests which were collected between August 5th and August 21st.: That would have provided more detail.
The statement in the original story was "From a two-week period starting Aug. 10 through Monday, there were no Yellow Jackets athletes who had tested positive for the coronavirus". Does that mean that no positive results were received for samples collected starting August 10th through August 24th? Maybe a positive result was received on August 12th, but it was collected on August 9th. Does it mean that no positive results were received August 10th to 24th? Maybe a positive result was received on August 9th. How long does it take to receive the results? If it takes a day or two then a positive sample could have been collected on the 22nd, 23rd, or 24th and the positive result wouldn't have been known when Ken got the information.
I don't know where Ken go the information, which makes judging accuracy of the information difficult. I don't know if the August 10th date signifies the start date of samples taken or results received. I don't know how long it takes to get the results. I doubt it takes 5 or 6 days, but I don't know. With all that uncertainty the two week period could actually only signify 8 or 9 days of no positive samples collected.
All the misinformation seems to be coming from GT, not Ken.
Also remember there are false negatives. Back in May I got stick and my symptoms checked the boxes off of nearly everything pointing to COVID, but the test came back negative. When the nurse handed me the results and said it was negative, she said at least 3-4 times that false negatives are possible. Took me about a month to get back to 100%.
As I had stated before that it was entirely possible for an athlete, such as the one that this thread is about, could have started showing symptoms Sunday the 23rd and still not have produced a positive result as of Monday the 24th. "Previously unreported" positive tests could be because the results are being posted to the date the samples were collected instead of the date of the result being reported. We don't have enough data to make good analysis. Instead of "misleading" or "misinformation" from Ken or the GTAA, I highly suspect that it is misinterpretation on our part.
My wife is a nurse and says they see false negatives a lot. They treat based on the symptoms and report to the state anyway. South Carolina has a separate sub category they track called presumed positives and presumed COVID deaths. They are included in the data but you can also see the breakout of it.
4 Georgia Tech athletes found to have COVID-19 in past week
In the past week, four Georgia Tech athletes tested positive for COVID-19, perhaps an indication of the increasing challenges of keeping Yellow Jackets athletes away from the coronavirus on a college campus.www.ajc.com
I'm not trying to take away from the student athletes catching the virus but I will say thats a 0.016% positive test rate. I think thats pretty damn good.And there is everybody’s answers. The information previously published was false.
4/244=.016, or 1.6%. It's still a decent positive rate, but not quite as good as your calculation.I'm not trying to take away from the student athletes catching the virus but I will say thats a 0.016% positive test rate. I think thats pretty damn good.
well considering the fact we're dealing with a bunch of 19-21 year olds who swap bodily fluids amongst other things ..... it could be worse4/244=.016, or 1.6%. It's still a decent positive rate, but not quite as good as your calculation.