- Messages
- 12,083
- Location
- Marietta, GA
Won't be Neal... at least it shouldn't be.
I don't expect an answer before Tuesday.
I also expect Charlotte to dance before us.
A couple of responses to others:
It's pretty obvious the Price public announcement is to appease a few alum. Price was never a serious candidate and was told so. We are aiming higher.
No announcement would be made tomorrow regardless of what you want to believe. At the earliest would be probably Tuesday/Wednesday
FWIW, a good poster on another board (dabiz) said they sent out a lot of feelers yesterday. Mack declined to interview. He doesn't believe they have anyone lined up.
Neal kinda that Cremins thing going on. His record isn't nothing to get excited about for sure. Why not get Mack?
Whew. Thankfully we don't just hire someone cause he went to Tech.
Good lord. I was hoping MBob made a move because he had someone in his back pocket lined up, and not because his seat was getting warm for the CBG extension debacle and making a move to make one.
Regardless of whether of nor MBob had someone in his back pocked lined up, retaining gregory was not an option.
As a close personal friend of Mark, he says he wasn't ever a candidate. This comes from his own personal "self eval" and was never contacted formally as GT administration seeks a HC with more years as a HC and success as one.
It was more of an option this year than last year. First post season appearance, winning 20+ games, and decreasing buyout even more. We wouldn't necessarily liked it, but it would have been more understandable than last year.
"Not an option" only applies if CBG totally embarassed GT or just tanked this season. Neither of which happened.
No it wasn't.
Last year we could get away with bringing him back without an extension. This year we can't, and after the stunt he pulled letting the fanbase think that the buyout wasn't impacted last time, any extension would have been met with way too much backlash regardless of impact on buyout.
Last year after retaining him MBob publicly all but said he wante dto fire him and flat out told him how to do his job. He said "It's not as much about a number as showing clear signs of progress and a belief in the future of the program," . That means this year, in order to retain gregory he would have to make an argument why he has belief in the future of this program under gregory. 20 wins and an nit spot mean all of nothing when it comes with one of the most senior dependent teams in the nation. An AD who was at a basketball first school and publicly told the coach how to do his job isn't going to turn around and act like the team wasn't going to tank like the number one pick in the draft was on the line next year because of a mediocre nit year on the backs of a ton of seniors who wouldn't be there.
The only message retaining gregory would have sent is that our athletic department had no intentions of supporting the basketball program and were willing to trade away another season and suffer the long term negative effects that retaining gregory would have in order to save a couple hundred thousand. And no coach worth a damn is going to come to a place where he believes the administration doesn't support the program.
just remember..... it was paul phewitt that put our program where it is now. not bryan gregory. he was able to fix some of our academic issues but recruiting was so down when he was hired that only immediate winning would cure that. it did not happen.
i love coach gregory and hope he lands on his feet.