I looked at this for another post. Since 2010 (9 years), Tech had a 247 recruiting rating above 50 5 times. It isn't hard to check this.Recruiting In the top 50 is still a success and foreign to Tech. But let’s use your logic and say that all the teams with less Commits then Bama will still finish higher then them this season.
How many games had Thacker coached against the TO? IDK but it looked like zero though
Set mining with lower pocket pairs is a ... oh, wait, that's a different discussion.
I've only gotten through the first half of USF and am hoping to get through the rest of it and the Citadel game to summarize my thoughts, maybe even do a video if I have time. But what *is* funny is that we were doing a lot of the things people were saying we weren't ("WAI NO SLANT ROUTE?!! WAI NO WR SCREENS?!1!!1). We even ran the triple option several times ...
The average rating of the players is the most important factor in success. I’m not sure how these damn rankings actually work but they’re slanted towards number of recruits instead of quality of recruits. We were lowly ranked (50 or so) before and we’re nearly as lowly ranked now. I hope we move the needle next year or close well this year. We’re going to need it.Oth, it also doesn't mean much. Our average stars were higher then many rated "above" Tech; we were sometimes restricted in the number of players we could bring in.
Which changes nothing about what happened here. We could not field a consistent defense for 10 years. I don't care if Army's defense is the second coming of the steel curtain. We couldn't do that here for whatever reason you want to give it.
I apologize again because I'm not sure I can always tell you and @stylee apart. I was just a very rare lurker at bbuzzoff. However, IIrc, you did a primer of some of the base plays of CPJ's offense with pictures and play diagrams/descriptions.
If that was you, and you could do the same with what we're doing now, I'm sure folks would appreciate it. We may even be able to get @Longestday to use it to do some of his offensive play break-downs.
GT did not lose to the Citadel based on talent or OL. The new 404 culture resulted in 75 yards of penalties, rotating QBs before the game was put away, and bad in game management.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not a Sewak fan and I believe he is CPJs biggest mistake in his coaching career. The OL is depleted and will make 2019 more difficult.
Set mining with lower pocket pairs is a ... oh, wait, that's a different discussion.
I've only gotten through the first half of USF and am hoping to get through the rest of it and the Citadel game to summarize my thoughts, maybe even do a video if I have time. But what *is* funny is that we were doing a lot of the things people were saying we weren't ("WAI NO SLANT ROUTE?!! WAI NO WR SCREENS?!1!!1). We even ran the triple option several times ...
It would have worked fine without the dumba$$ penalties and if the Offense had a pulse.I really like Thacker and what he is doing with the defense. However, at his press conf concerning the upcoming game against the Citadel he was cocky, even arrogant sounding about his roots in conferences with the to3 and how he knew all about that scheme. Well his plan did not look like what has been beating CPJ lately, and there were no adjustments of consequence in the game, He was ill prepared. I hope this was an awakening for him to get back on track. He needs to get some seriousness going and get rid of the foolishness, lack of discipline, and showboating. Time to do and stop the talk.
Can't find many positives just a bunch of confusion on our part; To rub salt in the wound; They won with the backup QB playing most of the 4th quarter
This is the one thing I don't understand. If this is our culture, where were these penalties in the first two games?The new 404 culture resulted in 75 yards of penalties
But this doesn't fit with the narrative of most people here. It seems people on here now care more about perception and what the media thinks of our program instead of facts.I looked at this for another post. Since 2010 (9 years), Tech had a 247 recruiting rating above 50 5 times. It isn't hard to check this.
Oth, it also doesn't mean much. Our average stars were higher then many rated "above" Tech; we were sometimes restricted in the number of players we could bring in.
I’m considering breaking down the offense. Just haven’t had the time recently
Yeah I’m switching things up this week and doing to offensive breakdown. Gotta catch the baby while she’s asleep