- Messages
- 10,050
- Location
- Oriental, NC
Why Michigan canceled football game vs. Ohio State
Michigan AD Warde Manuel says the team does not have a "total grasp of the virus."
www.mlive.com
Why Michigan canceled football game vs. Ohio State
Michigan AD Warde Manuel says the team does not have a "total grasp of the virus."www.mlive.com
I agree about NDI think Ohio State And ND are in because of ratings. Even if ND loses to Clemson.
The only thing the CFBPO committee likes more than fairness is money.
And I think TV pulls more strings than my tin foil will handle.
It's their conference... they can do whatever they want.It looks like the B1G is changing the rules to allow tOSU to play in the championship game.
$$$$
That should have been the plan since the get go. Stop at Thanksgiving and start the playoffs 2nd weekend in December.Here's a better choice for the chinavirus CFP
personally if they didn't play 9-10 games, I'd make them start at a play-in round
View attachment 9589
What a huge crock of s—tNot sure how many NY Times readers we have, but this is a good essay regarding the B1G football decision. Hopefully it's not behind their paywall.
Was the College Football Season Worth It? (Published 2020)
It brought joy — and revenue. But the full cost will never be tallied.www.nytimes.com
Could you please point out which part is “fake news”? It’s a long article and I didn’t read it but it seems to be a lot of information. Just want to know what isn’t true. ThankskbaiWhat a huge crock of s—t
A continued slanted narrative and scare tactic. The NYT needs to be put out of its misery
The history of the decision and the flip flops is fine and hopefully based on facts from actual interviews. But they attributed motivation to President Trump that is not known and are editorial on their part, not news or facts. Then they ended the article with another editorial portrayed as news -“But the cost for that will never be tallied. How many of those Saturday afternoons spent watching football games with friends bear some responsibility for the 100,000 confirmed Covid-related deaths around America since the first snap of a Big Ten game this season? And because we’re still learning about this novel virus, the damage it wreaked on hundreds of players may not become evident for years. The lasting effects of the 2020 college season are unknowable”. It may be unknowable, but the spin is that hundreds of players and thousands of fans are damaged or dead.Could you please point out which part is “fake news”? It’s a long article and I didn’t read it but it seems to be a lot of information. Just want to know what isn’t true. Thankskbai
It's a magazine essay, not a news story. I disagree with some of the piece, but I think he did a good job with it. Now, if you simply do not think the NYT is legit, I can understand your POV. I have been reading the Times for most of my adult life and see it as mostly aimed at the truth. That means it occasionally misses the mark. But it's not because they don't care.The history of the decision and the flip flops is fine and hopefully based on facts from actual interviews. But they attributed motivation to President Trump that is not known and are editorial on their part, not news or facts. Then they ended the article with another editorial portrayed as news -“But the cost for that will never be tallied. How many of those Saturday afternoons spent watching football games with friends bear some responsibility for the 100,000 confirmed Covid-related deaths around America since the first snap of a Big Ten game this season? And because we’re still learning about this novel virus, the damage it wreaked on hundreds of players may not become evident for years. The lasting effects of the 2020 college season are unknowable”. It may be unknowable, but the spin is that hundreds of players and thousands of fans are damaged or dead.
I have a philosophical issue with any news outlet that mixes factual news with conjecture and editorial content. That seems to be the norm these days, but the NYT has coasted on its history and reputation to present opinion as fact. If they want to write editorials and label them as such, fine with meIt's a magazine essay, not a news story. I disagree with some of the piece, but I think he did a good job with it. Now, if you simply do not think the NYT is legit, I can understand your POV. I have been reading the Times for most of my adult life and see it as mostly aimed at the truth. That means it occasionally misses the mark. But it's not because they don't care.
I have a philosophical issue with any news outlet that mixes factual news with conjecture and editorial content. That seems to be the norm these days, but the NYT has coasted on its history and reputation to present opinion as fact. If they want to write editorials and label them as such, fine with me
Good article. Most of the Big 10 decision making process was already known but it was nice to see some actual quotes from some of those involved. The part about football basically driving large (and sometimes illegal) social gatherings which in turn helped drive surging covid numbers was pretty interesting though. There was no way to avoid that other than not playing. That would apply to the NFL as well. It would be interesting to see a wider study done on that. Something we can possibly learn from in the future.Not sure how many NY Times readers we have, but this is a good essay regarding the B1G football decision. Hopefully it's not behind their paywall.
Was the College Football Season Worth It? (Published 2020)
It brought joy — and revenue. But the full cost will never be tallied.www.nytimes.com