dressedcheeseside
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 14,220
In your opinion , who should they be?umm, 2/3 of your athletic department board should not be professors. Lets start there. Nuff said
In your opinion , who should they be?umm, 2/3 of your athletic department board should not be professors. Lets start there. Nuff said
Absolutely love this concept.
I'll take that as a noAnybody attending this? I can't but I'm curious if he shares some new info.
https://staffcouncil.gatech.edu/rsvp
AD Todd Stansbury lays out his vision, priorities for Georgia Tech
http://www.myajc.com/sports/college...ties-for-georgia-tech/vXdTqBhzWZwJ34LPN6MK9O/
At the heart of that plan is his creation of what he called an “ideation” team, which he likened to an in-house ad agency that will be unlike a traditional marketing office in that it won’t be tasked with promoting upcoming games, teams or season-ticket packages, but with spreading the Tech brand. The office will create content that can be shared on social media, on its website and publications and shown to recruits and donors.
“So that starts to resonate and people start to identify, You know what? Georgia Tech really does have a special group of student-athletes that go on to be incredibly successful,” Stansbury said.
so um. Where can I apply??AD Todd Stansbury lays out his vision, priorities for Georgia Tech
http://www.myajc.com/sports/college...ties-for-georgia-tech/vXdTqBhzWZwJ34LPN6MK9O/
At the heart of that plan is his creation of what he called an “ideation” team, which he likened to an in-house ad agency that will be unlike a traditional marketing office in that it won’t be tasked with promoting upcoming games, teams or season-ticket packages, but with spreading the Tech brand. The office will create content that can be shared on social media, on its website and publications and shown to recruits and donors.
“So that starts to resonate and people start to identify, You know what? Georgia Tech really does have a special group of student-athletes that go on to be incredibly successful,” Stansbury said.
Stansbury has his work cut out for him with the GT Alumni Association. The Alumni Assn basically told the Alumni clubs around the country to stop talking with kids&parents of accepted students. Seems they don't want us screwing up the branding they are doing. Well, that's fine.
Below is what was put out in an e-mail from the Alumni Assn President so you can judge for yourself. Remember who we are talking about here .... accepted students. If GT doesn't want the students to come to GT, they shouldn't accept them. One of our favorite things in the club was meeting with the kids and their parents and networking on why GT may or may not be right for the kids. They have so much enthusiasm. Only the kids can decide and they really just need to wander around campus and soak up the atmosphere..... and we had recent GT grads to talk about what GT was really like.
This is his whole speech
I really like the way that he considers himself an educator--and by extension, the idea that primary task of the entire Athletic Association is education.
I have not been involved with the Alumni Association, so I don't know any of the history. This email doesn't appear to me to be the Alumni Association requesting the change. It appears to be the leaders of the Alumni Association letting the members know that the Admissions Department requesting a change. The thing that would bother me if I had been involved is that the email has a lot of words with no substantive explanation, and then says to not ask any questions just do what the Admissions Department has asked.
Since I was not involved, I am making assumptions that: The Admissions Department made requests of the Alumni Association, The Alumni Association forwarded the requests to the AA members, The AA members protested, and this email was supposed to explain things. If I were involved, and the the Admissions Department and the AA explained a plan, I could support it even if I didn't fully agree with it. However, I would not be amenable to being told blah, blah, blah, blah, now shut up.
If true, then we will fail in the world of intercollegiate athletics.
If the "primary task" of the GTAA is as stated, then it is more than duplicitous and should be shut down with club teams run by the students and the Hill.
Fair points all. The reasons weren't described that way as you pointed out. What is simply implied is that Admissions didn't want the clubs to increase yield on already accepted students. That doesn't make sense.
The reason I brought this up is I think it is more than just the Admissions Dept not wanting our (Alumni clubs) involvement; I think it is a desire for consistent branding through out. I have to admit that the clubs have older people in them who are not where GT wants to go or who GT wants to be projecting the new "brand". The students and outlook today are much different than 20 or more years ago.
I really like Stansbury. I think he has a tough job and that he'll do as well or better than anyone else at. I hope he does the Athletic Assn donations up. The post was to point out that "branding" may not be without unintended consequences like insulting alumni.
Stansbury has his work cut out for him with the GT Alumni Association. The Alumni Assn basically told the Alumni clubs around the country to stop talking with kids&parents of accepted students. Seems they don't want us screwing up the branding they are doing. Well, that's fine.
I spent the last decade being fairly involved in recruiting and change has been in the air for a while. They're not trying to alienate the high $$ donors or those in prestigious positions. What they're trying to rid themselves of is the "look to the left, look to the right" crowd, those who refer to our last days at GT as "getting out", folks that admire those clever enough to steal the T, those of us that drink too much, like to tell stories about getting shafted, don't dress right (wear whatever shade of gold we damn well please), yell THWG too loud & like sports. We're in what I'll call the "unprotected class" and I believe the AA wishes we would all just go away even at the expense of losing a fair amount of donations.I agree that the email made no sense. If it is about branding, it would be ludicrous to try to develop new supporters, but at the same time alienate the current supporters who donate more money than all but two public universities.
I'm a proud member of that "unprotected class," and I'm sure as hell not going away, at least until I pass on. It's not like our memories are negatively directed towards the Institute; those memories are our tradition. Why the hell get rid of tradition?I spent the last decade being fairly involved in recruiting and change has been in the air for a while. They're not trying to alienate the high $$ donors or those in prestigious positions. What they're trying to rid themselves of is the "look to the left, look to the right" crowd, those who refer to our last days at GT as "getting out", folks that admire those clever enough to steal the T, those of us that drink too much, like to tell stories about getting shafted, don't dress right (wear whatever shade of gold we damn well please), yell THWG too loud & like sports. We're in what I'll call the "unprotected class" and I believe the AA wishes we would all just go away even at the expense of losing a fair amount of donations.
I'm a proud member of that "unprotected class," and I'm sure as hell not going away, at least until I pass on. It's not like our memories are negatively directed towards the Institute; those memories are our tradition. Why the hell get rid of tradition?