Spring Practice

[TechPhi97]

That’s kind of who I figured it was. Him with Lockett and Biggers is some serious beef on the interior. Can’t wait to hear Santucci talking about personnel.

Just added a DT from Penn State. Can’t be a bad thing

 

[mtodd30]

Yall hear that comment from Key about a 3 man front possibility? With our bigger D Line transfers, we might be headed that way. Bigger D linemen and our edge guys will look more like OLB.

May solve our run defense problem, and help us get a bit more pressure on the QB that just wasn’t happening last year.

What are yalls thoughts?

 

[YJMD]

Yall hear that comment from Key about a 3 man front possibility? With our bigger D Line transfers, we might be headed that way. Bigger D linemen and our edge guys will look more like OLB.

May solve our run defense problem, and help us get a bit more pressure on the QB that just wasn’t happening last year.

What are yalls thoughts?

What would it be? 3-3-5 stack base?

I'm not sure it matters inherently. Whatever our personnel can execute.

 

[stinger78]

What would it be? 3-3-5 stack base?

I'm not sure it matters inherently. Whatever our personnel can execute.

Yes, whatever. Depends on personnel. That fifth DB would need to be a stout dude to play run support. I guess Efford, Tatum, and Lightsey would have to be penciled in at LB at this point, but a couple of underclass LB played a lot of ST last season. They may push a bit, too.

 

[TampaBuzz]

Yall hear that comment from Key about a 3 man front possibility? With our bigger D Line transfers, we might be headed that way. Bigger D linemen and our edge guys will look more like OLB.

May solve our run defense problem, and help us get a bit more pressure on the QB that just wasn’t happening last year.

What are yalls thoughts?

It would be fun to have a multi-look defense that can switch out between 4-2 and 3-3 effectively and give the enemy more to think about. It all depends on the defensive tackles/nose guards and (I almost can't believe I am saying this) we certainly have some big boys in those positions. I am really interested to see what this year brings!

 

[57jacket]

Georgia Tech’s Haynes King looks to lead Yellow Jackets to avoid complacency

“He’s really put himself in a position to be one of the best leaders I’ve seen at that position.”

www.ajc.com

 

[MidtownJacket]

What would it be? 3-3-5 stack base?

I'm not sure it matters inherently. Whatever our personnel can execute.

In his media availability today he we heard 4-2-5 is the base.

 

[UgaBlows]

In his media availability today he we heard 4-2-5 is the base.

Where did you see that presser?

 

[MidtownJacket]

Where did you see that presser?

Georgia Tech Football Practice Notes and Quotes 3/15

ATLANTA- Georgia Tech football dodged bad weather for the last practice before spring break begins on the Flats with a

georgiatech.rivals.com

KQ's coverage on Rivals

 

[57jacket]

Georgia Tech Football Practice Notes and Quotes 3/15

ATLANTA- Georgia Tech football dodged bad weather for the last practice before spring break begins on the Flats with a

georgiatech.rivals.com

KQ's coverage on Rivals

Thanks Mid...Good read

 

[Em_Jae20]

 

[IM79]

Great, another follicly challenged coach.

 

[forensicbuzz]

Yes, whatever. Depends on personnel. That fifth DB would need to be a stout dude to play run support. I guess Efford, Tatum, and Lightsey would have to be penciled in at LB at this point, but a couple of underclass LB played a lot of ST last season. They may push a bit, too.

I could see Tatum, who's lighter and faster, potentially playing the hybrid LB/S role. Might be why he pulled his name from the Portal.

 

[forensicbuzz]

It would be fun to have a multi-look defense that can switch out between 4-2 and 3-3 effectively and give the enemy more to think about. It all depends on the defensive tackles/nose guards and (I almost can't believe I am saying this) we certainly have some big boys in those positions. I am really interested to see what this year brings!

if we go with a 3-man front, the NG would almost assuredly be playing a 1-technique not a 0-technique. As big as out guys are, I don't see any of them taking on 2 blockers and clogging the lanes.

 

[forensicbuzz]

Forget all I just wrote. Looks like 4-2-5. Never mind.

 

[King2b]

Great, another follicly challenged coach.

Why do so many have an issue with this? Speaking as one who's follicles stopped working long ago, I don't see an issue. Would you rather they have something done to look younger like plugs, tight pants and no socks?

 

[stinger78]

I could see Tatum, who's lighter and faster, potentially playing the hybrid LB/S role. Might be why he pulled his name from the Portal.

My thought, too.

 

[jacketup]

I could see Tatum, who's lighter and faster, potentially playing the hybrid LB/S role. Might be why he pulled his name from the Portal.

Agree. I thought it was a mistake last year to not play a 4-3 on what would be considered rushing downs (and our rush D stats showed it). Tatum could give that flexibility. He's a tweener--may as well use it to an advantage.

 

[stinger78]

Forget all I just wrote. Looks like 4-2-5. Never mind.

Yep. Santucci told us what he was doing with the down linemen: 1 tackle, 1 nose, 1 end, 1 rush. To me, that signals a 1/2-tech, a 0-tech, and two down the line in some configuration depending on the call. That 0-tech will need to be a 2-gapper somehow, so one of them will need to grow/be coached into that capability.

 

[g0lftime]

Yep. Santucci told us what he was doing with the down linemen: 1 tackle, 1 nose, 1 end, 1 rush. To me, that signals a 1/2-tech, a 0-tech, and two down the line in some configuration depending on the call. That 0-tech will need to be a 2-gapper somehow, so one of them will need to grow/be coached into that capability.

Will our down DL attack the gaps or engage and read? Not familiar with 0-tech term.