- Messages
- 2,856
Not perfect... but too long to redo.
Thanks again for this breakdown.
I'm not saying it should have been called, but the hit on JT on the second pass play (~4:40 mark)...anyone think that could have been targeting?
It looks like helmet to helmet contact.
I don't disagree. I was more interested as to whether or not that hit could be considered targeting. I have no problem with the non-call. It's just that this particular penalty is so severe that I'm always interested as to what could or should be called. FWIW, as I re-watched the play I think the DL first made contact with his hands then the helmet to helmet contact follows...I'm not sure if that is grounds for a penalty or not.I am not trying to be a smart @$$ but I never like to dissect games for missed or blown calls by the refs. Nothing good comes of it...and besides, there are no telling how many mistakes get made in the course of a game.As the ol' coaching cliche says, "focus only on things that we can control".
Sure woukd be great if coach had a weekly tv show so he could comment on this. It happened in gsu as well.On the 4th down play---BURDEN a SENIOR passed up a 310 lb DT that made the tackle.NO excuse.
Friend of mine who played under PJ at Southern said to watch how soon the B back starts - could get called for illegal procedure every snapSure woukd be great if coach had a weekly tv show so he could comment on this. It happened in gsu as well.View attachment 1955
Note that others are not moving at snap (besides mills). .
DeVine starts to slow as the game progresses. He is a big dude. When you slow down, you have trouble getting off the snap quick and you lose push. Also he did have a lingering injury.
The was not a wrong person issue. This was a split issue, a BB track issue, and I would say we needed a little more chip on 6 from the center (but the center was trying to get the LB that might have filled the "hole").
The BB movement can be considered motion and is not forward. This makes it legal.
DeVine starts to slow as the game progresses. He is a big dude. When you slow down, you have trouble getting off the snap quick and you lose push. Also he did have a lingering injury.
The was not a wrong person issue. This was a split issue, a BB track issue, and I would say we needed a little more chip on 6 from the center (but the center was trying to get the LB that might have filled the "hole").
My guess is that since we've had such a hard time getting to the MLB, we've made less effort with the chip on the LOS in order to have a better angle at the MLB who is actually the primary assignment. Somebody else is supposed to get that DT. I'm sure he's not supposed to be unblocked.The center normally chips the guy to help with the wide split issue for the guard. That is the guards block. I think a longer chip was in order, but I am no expert.