Thought 3:
Sims was 3 for 8. It's not like he was out there blundering 25-30 throws.
In order (w/ running total):
- Incomplete (0 for 1)
- Complete (1 for 2)
- Incomplete (1 for 3)
- Complete (2 for 4)
- Incomplete (2 for 5)
- Incomplete (2 for 6)
- Incomplete (2 for 7)
- Complete (3 for 8)
Recognizing that several of those incompletions were with guys running wide open, at what point in the sequence above would folks have stopped calling the "throw to guys wide open" plays? We didn't reach scale imo, even though many of the throws were cringey.
"There have always been accuracy questions". First, I agree. Second, I'll point out that his 37% completion rate yesterday was well below his 55% clip last year. There's no reason our OC should have expected the results of the first 8 attempts, nor due to sample size had a ton of reason to believe he would not snap out of it. Many of his misfires last year were while running for his life. Yesterday was just... wtf.
I'm also not saying it's entirely on Jeff. Seems it was more in his head yesterday than anything which coaches are in part responsible for. There is just a lot of extrapolation on play-calling for 8 plays which in theory I think we'd all have expected Jeff to complete at a greater clip. Hindsight 20/20 though. I totally get that we were running well.