We have one more football season before the contract ends.
We had New Jersey's this year. The only game that didn't was BC and most likely the reason was the time involved to ship everything overseas.No new jerseys this past year and no names on bowl jerseys suggests we're out early.
We had New Jersey's this year. The only game that didn't was BC and most likely the reason was the time involved to ship everything overseas.
The bowl jerseys were provided before the 2014 season and have been sitting at Tech since then. More on Tech for the nameplates than Russell I assume the Tech equipment staff elected not to see on all the name plates.
It's possible the last year is either forgone or bought out but there aren't many suggestions either way to prognosticate that.
Link for contract? Where it's done doesn't answer contract question.yes, for the longest time the numbers and nameplates were done by a tiny sports store in dallas, GA...or hiram, ga for tech. Not sure if still today the case using that same place (i don't see why they wouldn't), or what store they use now, but my point is that stitching is done here locally....so its on tech...not on russell...
2017 will be last season in Russell unless they agree to end early which there have been discussions. UA is the leader but Nike is also in play. I believe Stansbury's roommate from GT is an exec at UA so I think that could seal the deal. Hearing around $100 mill for 10 years. UA will pay more because of UGA being Nike and Boston College being the only UA school in the ACC, not counting ND.
Unpopular opinion: I don't mind our Russell jerseys and I like having an "underdog" sponsor
Under Armour is an underdog sponsor. Russell Athletic is the old dead dog they've already buried in the backyard.
Will this mean we as fans will get a better selection of tee shirts, etc?
Current selections are almost all gray.
I ended up with a black and gray tax slayer long sleeve tee shirt. I put it in the nice work shirt drawer.
The largest part of the deal you guys are completely ignoring and it has nothing to do with uniforms.
both UA and Nike provide advertising consulting/agreements with all their schools now. The influx of a UA team redesigning the AA's outreach from the bottom up is the real thing GT will benefit from FAR more than what the uniforms look like.
2017 will be last season in Russell unless they agree to end early which there have been discussions. UA is the leader but Nike is also in play. I believe Stansbury's roommate from GT is an exec at UA so I think that could seal the deal. Hearing around $100 mill for 10 years. UA will pay more because of UGA being Nike and Boston College being the only UA school in the ACC, not counting ND.
Agree, but just look at Auburn, Wisconsin, Notre Dame, Navy etc. they will do us justice.as long as i dont see maryland styled uniforms i dont care who does what