augustabuzz
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 3,412
"We're going to Charlotte!"
I predict 7-5 with more frustration as JT continues his Reggie-like career trajectory.
Its a helluva lot harder to climb up from 3-9 then it is to drop to 3-9.
Even if those predictions are based on accurate data at this point in time and that data is analyzed correctly leading to sound conclusions, the factors that drive actual probabilities will change dramatically before the start of next season. Teams that look good in December may suck the following October, just look at us for an example. Injuries and a wide variety of attrition happen to everybody and have a huge impact on probabilities yet we have no way to predict them. Complacency can infect any player or team anywhere and have a dramatic affect on probability. Staff changes can and will still occur throughout the league, as well. Individual player development is unpredictable as is team synergy. Just way too many unknowns at this point.Do you have any idea how painful this post is for people who care about precision?
Even if those predictions are based on accurate data at this point in time and that data is analyzed correctly leading to sound conclusions, the factors that drive actual probabilities will change dramatically before the start of next season. Teams that look good in December may suck the following October, just look at us for an example. Injuries and a wide variety of attrition happen to everybody and have a huge impact on probabilities yet we have no way to predict them. Complacency can infect any player or team anywhere and have a dramatic affect on probability. Staff changes can and will still occur throughout the league, as well. Individual player development is unpredictable as is team synergy. Just way too many unknowns at this point.
Making projections, even educated ones, right now might be a fun a exercise, but is meaningless in reality.
???? You calculated probabilities to 5 or 6 significant digits based on data of 1, didn't you?
That sounds accurate, to the extent that the inputs can be considered "data". But they were clearly artificial, and when a calculation is done numerically an input of 0.1 is assumed by the computer to be 0.100000000000000. Which is why pretending the inputs are in fractional increments of 1/10 makes sense.
I could do an error analysis by assuming an uncertainty of 0.1 and perturbing the inputs randomly in an "upper-lower bound" fashion for multiple runs to see how the results vary. But ain't nobody got time for that. I'm not designing an aircraft over here.
My bad, I should have attached it to the post you were responding to.This has nothing to do with my post.
Most posts on this forum are meaningless in reality.
I hope the fire is already there now. It better be.I think the staff and team will have a fire in their bellies next year.
Did Butker make a FG to end an unofficial practice."We're going to Charlotte!"